Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/25/2006 11:19:56 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Nachum
Rule #6 in war.......

don't fight for the same ground twice.

2 posted on 04/25/2006 11:23:30 AM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (Toon Town, Iran...........where reality is the real fantasy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Israel would be wise to heed his advice.


3 posted on 04/25/2006 11:43:41 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
No do-overs. Israel uncharacteristically looks like a befuddled fool on the world stage lately.
5 posted on 04/25/2006 11:47:06 AM PDT by HitmanLV (Don't stomp so hard! Your dentures will fall out!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

It wasn't necessarily a mistake to withdraw. Israel had to, has to, do three things. Choose a line she is prepared to defend. She did that. Secondly, get her people on the safe side of that line, and she did that also.

Now she has to push that line forward, in response to every violation of that line. That third step is absolutely vital. Every attack has to be answered by exacting a price in territory.

Killing your attackers is necessary but ultimately futile, since the arabs have an endless supply of cannon fodder and care nothing about lives damaged or lost. Only land matters to them, so that is the only retaliation that means anything. Every mortar shell, every rocket, every deluded teenager who gets across the line has to be answered by moving the line forward half a kilometer. Any arab residence affected by moving the line should be paid for in cash and bulldozed, and its inhabitants pushed to the far side of the new line.

Israel should never allow itself to be put back in the business of managing arabs. They should be kept on the far side of the line, with the line sealed, and the previous "land for peace" policy with the one-way ratchet has to be reversed. Israel's new policy should be "land for peace" with a one-way ratchet, ratcheting toward Cairo. And Amman. And Damascus. Every attack costs half a kilometer permanently.


7 posted on 04/25/2006 11:55:28 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Build a wall around it, with no doors. Declare the territory the sovereign state of Palestine. If rockets are launched from the sovereign state of Palestine, the sovereign state of Israel should respond with massive artillary bombardment.


8 posted on 04/25/2006 12:12:03 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (A Liberal: One who demands half of your pie, because he didn't bake one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
And while they're at it, as far as I care, they could take Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, the Arabian pennisula (including, of course, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Oman, Qatar, UAE, Kuwait, etc.) and the Sinai. Pave the way with nukes. Israel deserves a country of territorial significance.

Heck, if I were president, I'd even give them Iraq after doing a little wheeling and dealing on oil. Sure would change the look of that region for the better.

Yes, sounds crazy, I know. And every time I read about innocent people being murdered by those mad islamic dogs, I get crazier. Sorry, can't help it.

12 posted on 04/25/2006 12:42:54 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

There is only one workable solution to the situation. The slammite world has to be forced to find some place in the gigantic swath of territory it owns to put the "palestinians", and that place has to be at least 500 miles from Israel.


14 posted on 04/25/2006 1:06:46 PM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

More Israeli denial of reality. The Israeli government intends to withdraw from the Old City of Jerusalem and from most of Judea and Samaria. Gaza is inconsequential compared to what's coming next!


15 posted on 04/25/2006 1:15:12 PM PDT by hlmencken3 (Originalist on the the 'general welfare' clause? No? NOT an originalist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson