[americaprd]

How can Sestak's spokersperson call this a "smear?" Isn't a smear something that's not true? Sestak's own finance reports indicate he accepted the money from her. Its a fact.

Also, their going to claim its okay because McCarthy has not been charged with anything? She lied on a lie detector test and only then admitted she leaked classified information. She's admitted to it!

Not only that, but Sestak's refused to return money from Sandy Berger and John Deutch, both of whom also mishandled classified infomation and in the case of Berger intentionally destryoed it.

Hopefully some freepers can write some letters to the Inquirer letting readers know what they think of Sestak taking her contributions, refusing to return them, and then hiding behind the fact that she hasn't been charged with anything (yet).

inquirer.letters@phillynews.com

[onyx]

Mary is quite the democrat contributor.

Ohio and now PA.

[Enchante]

"Isn't a smear something that's not true?"

That would be common sense usage - but for the Demagogues and MSM reporters, anytime you point out true facts about their leftist treasonous tendencies that is a 'smear' - on the other hand, any nonsense they can make up Paul Begala style about Rs is not a smear but merely stating what they want the public to believe (MSM style).

I hope you are now clear on the malleable concept of a 'smear'........

[SueRae]

Go Weldon.

Time for a letter writing campaign to Phillynews.