Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HILLARY REMEMBERS: the clintons commit perjury with impunity
doug from upland, Free Republic ^ | 4.25.06 | Mia T

Posted on 04/25/2006 3:10:04 AM PDT by Mia T

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 04/25/2006 3:10:13 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

ping


2 posted on 04/25/2006 3:11:59 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; Slyfox; ...

ping


3 posted on 04/25/2006 3:14:05 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Mia T. Bump.


4 posted on 04/25/2006 3:18:44 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand; All

A glaring legal omission appears on the face of the tendered declaration. An omission, the absence of which amounts to and implied but inescapable admission/assertion of a prior history of unlawful/illegal conduct.

A Declaration requires not only that the witness state facts known to her to be true, but that she also state the basis upon which such facts could be known to her, i.e., how she was in a position to have heard, seen, thought, felt, or otherwise perceived the asserted fact.

The Declarant, one Hillary Rodham Clinton, states "she believes" she would have recalled what was alleged to have been discussed, had it in fact been discussed, despite an admitted, inability to recall what was actually discussed, presumably because the Declarant, correctly apprehends that had the discussion occurred as alleged, she would have been enaging in illegal acts. The only possible basis, however, for the Declarant "believing" she would have remembered such discussions, had they in fact occurred, is that she has prior experience committing illegal acts and based on that experience, she knows she tends not to forget such conduct at the same rate of mental deterioration as casual conduct not amounting to an illegal or wrongful act.

Thus, Mrs. Rodham-Clinton appears to be asserting, under oath, that she knows from prior experience that when she commits crimes of this magnitude, she remembers such facts, notwithstanding any loss of memory as to concurrent details not rising to the level of such criminal/unlawful activity.

posted on 04/24/2006 6:25:32 PM EDT
by
Gail Wynand
(Why not "virtual citizenship")


5 posted on 04/25/2006 3:24:09 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E.G.C.

thanx :)


6 posted on 04/25/2006 3:25:24 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
BTTT!!!

Good people of New York State ... the Nation needs you, now more than ever before, ...

Vote ... vote early ... vote often ... in Novemebr 2006 ... against "I cannot recall" Tubba!!!

7 posted on 04/25/2006 3:33:11 AM PDT by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamaksin

thx :)

Wouldn't it be wonderful if New Yorkers finally see the light?


8 posted on 04/25/2006 3:36:50 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

It wont happen. new Yorkers will elect Hillary just like Mass. will elect Kennedy.

You CAN fool some of the people ALL of the time.


9 posted on 04/25/2006 3:43:38 AM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
What is WRONG with them, anyway?

Let's think positive.

There is always the very real possibility that the clod will be the agent of her own demise.
All her opponent has to do is to force her onto the public stage.

 

Hillary-the-person isn't running. The idea of hillary is, the idea of hillary as put out on a daily basis by all manner of proxy, from simple spinner to elaborate Hollywood production.1

QUESTION: When was the last time you observed "the smartest woman in the world"2 partake in our process of political discourse, or, as Charles Kuralt once put it, relish in "the raucous give and take of American democracy?" ANSWER: Never. Hillary-the-person answers to no one.3

Hillary-the-person never shows her face. Hillary-the-person never talks. Part of the reason is substance-- or more precisely, the lack of it: The clintons are a truly banal bunch. But, as the husband amply demonstrates, banality, in and of itself, is not a nonstarter if you have a semblance of style. But, sadly, missus clinton doesn't have that, either.

The upshot of all this vacuity are positive numbers for hillary (such as they are) that are inversely related to appearance frequency, and, more specifically, inversely related to the following... variables....

The bottom line is this paradox: In order for hillary clinton to have any chance of winning elections, she must all but vanish from the public stage.
5

So when hillary-the-person has a problem, for example, she stays hidden and in her place dispatches her prevaricators to spin us silly. Harold Wolfson is the current model.

 

 

If the problem has already taken root, she plants false news stories about it. (Missus clinton's sorry sock-puppet status falls into this category.) 6

It is only when her power, treasure or freedom appears in imminent danger does she deign7 to put the lie10 in our face herself.8

SEX, LIES AND SOCK PUPPETS:
HOW THE CLINTONS ARE HANDLING THE HILLARY DUD FACTOR
4
by Mia T, 3.22.06
FOOTNOTES


10 posted on 04/25/2006 3:57:14 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All
Hillary-the-person answers to no one

 

December 7, 1941+64

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton



Dear Concerned Americans,

Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.

We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

COMPLETE LETTER

December 7, 1941+64
Mia T
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton


COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005



11 posted on 04/25/2006 4:03:41 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: UWSrepublican

ping


12 posted on 04/25/2006 4:20:44 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BARBRA

ping


13 posted on 04/25/2006 4:31:32 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


14 posted on 04/25/2006 5:04:20 AM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

thx :)


15 posted on 04/25/2006 5:17:32 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

ping


16 posted on 04/25/2006 5:29:28 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Zip

ping


17 posted on 04/25/2006 5:40:10 AM PDT by zip (((Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough become truth to 48% of all Americans (NRA)))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; All

Madonna remembers ping


18 posted on 04/25/2006 12:24:35 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Hillary a master of lies.


19 posted on 04/25/2006 1:46:25 PM PDT by bmwcyle (We got permits, yes we DO! We got permits, how 'bout YOU?;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

She's a compulsive liar. I don't know about her being a 'master,' tho.

If she were a master, then we wouldn't know about it, would we? The clintons are overrated as crooks, too. ;)

They've survived only because of the entrenched power in DC. If we are to cure our serious problems, we must first vote out every single professional politician.

Of course, in order to do this, we must have credible citizen politicians at the ready. Wanna run? ;)


20 posted on 04/25/2006 2:02:29 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson