Posted on 04/25/2006 3:10:04 AM PDT by Mia T
ping
ping
Mia T. Bump.
A glaring legal omission appears on the face of the tendered declaration. An omission, the absence of which amounts to and implied but inescapable admission/assertion of a prior history of unlawful/illegal conduct. A Declaration requires not only that the witness state facts known to her to be true, but that she also state the basis upon which such facts could be known to her, i.e., how she was in a position to have heard, seen, thought, felt, or otherwise perceived the asserted fact. The Declarant, one Hillary Rodham Clinton, states "she believes" she would have recalled what was alleged to have been discussed, had it in fact been discussed, despite an admitted, inability to recall what was actually discussed, presumably because the Declarant, correctly apprehends that had the discussion occurred as alleged, she would have been enaging in illegal acts. The only possible basis, however, for the Declarant "believing" she would have remembered such discussions, had they in fact occurred, is that she has prior experience committing illegal acts and based on that experience, she knows she tends not to forget such conduct at the same rate of mental deterioration as casual conduct not amounting to an illegal or wrongful act. Thus, Mrs. Rodham-Clinton appears to be asserting, under oath, that she knows from prior experience that when she commits crimes of this magnitude, she remembers such facts, notwithstanding any loss of memory as to concurrent details not rising to the level of such criminal/unlawful activity. posted on 04/24/2006 6:25:32 PM EDT |
thanx :)
Good people of New York State ... the Nation needs you, now more than ever before, ...
Vote ... vote early ... vote often ... in Novemebr 2006 ... against "I cannot recall" Tubba!!!
thx :)
Wouldn't it be wonderful if New Yorkers finally see the light?
It wont happen. new Yorkers will elect Hillary just like Mass. will elect Kennedy.
You CAN fool some of the people ALL of the time.
Let's think positive.
There is always the very real possibility that the clod will be the agent of her own demise.
Hillary-the-person isn't running. The idea of hillary is, the idea of hillary as put out on a daily basis by all manner of proxy, from simple spinner to elaborate Hollywood production.1 QUESTION: When was the last time you observed "the smartest woman in the world"2 partake in our process of political discourse, or, as Charles Kuralt once put it, relish in "the raucous give and take of American democracy?" ANSWER: Never. Hillary-the-person answers to no one.3 Hillary-the-person never shows her face. Hillary-the-person never talks. Part of the reason is substance-- or more precisely, the lack of it: The clintons are a truly banal bunch. But, as the husband amply demonstrates, banality, in and of itself, is not a nonstarter if you have a semblance of style. But, sadly, missus clinton doesn't have that, either. The upshot of all this vacuity are positive numbers for hillary (such as they are) that are inversely related to appearance frequency, and, more specifically, inversely related to the following... variables.... If the problem has already taken root, she plants false news stories about it. (Missus clinton's sorry sock-puppet status falls into this category.) 6 It is only when her power, treasure or freedom appears in imminent danger does she deign7 to put the lie10 in our face herself.8 SEX, LIES AND SOCK PUPPETS:
All her opponent has to do is to force her onto the public stage.
The bottom line is this paradox: In order for hillary clinton to have any chance of winning elections, she must all but vanish from the public stage.5
HOW THE CLINTONS ARE HANDLING THE HILLARY DUD FACTOR 4
by Mia T, 3.22.06
FOOTNOTES
December 7, 1941+64
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRORE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
Dear Concerned Americans,Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.
The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.
We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?
In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?
Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.
What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.
COMPLETE LETTER
December 7, 1941+64
Mia T
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005
ping
ping
bump
thx :)
ping
ping
Madonna remembers ping
Hillary a master of lies.
She's a compulsive liar. I don't know about her being a 'master,' tho.
If she were a master, then we wouldn't know about it, would we? The clintons are overrated as crooks, too. ;)
They've survived only because of the entrenched power in DC. If we are to cure our serious problems, we must first vote out every single professional politician.
Of course, in order to do this, we must have credible citizen politicians at the ready. Wanna run? ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.