I say prosecute the traitor.
“4. I have been advised that any breach of this Agreement may result in the termination of any security clearances I hold; removal from any position of special confidence and trust requiring such clearances; or the termination of my employment or other relationships with the Departments or Agencies that granted mysecurity clearance or clearances. In addition, I have been advised that any unauthorized disclosure of classified information by me may constitute a violation, or violations, of UnitedStatescriminal laws, including theprovisions of Sections641, 793, 794, 798, *952 and 1924, Title 18, United States Code, *the provisions of Section 783(b), Title 50, United States Code, and the provisions of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982. I recognize that nothing in this Agreement constitutes a waiver by theUnitedStatesof theright toprosecutemefor anystatutoryviolation. “
http://www.uscg.mil/ccs/cit/cim/forms1/FORMS/SF_312.pdf
Yeah, I've got no problem with a prosecution. It might take awhile, and the SF 312 isn't going to provide any help. But she might see a jail sentence in the future -- works for me.
My deepest hope is for something different -- I mostly hope that Americans get a sense for which party is serious about fighting this war, and which party isn't. I think this McCarthy matter will help throw light onto this difference -- it's already been helpful.