Skip to comments.
[...} fired Mary McCarthy ‘CATEGORICALLY DENIES’ being the source of the leak on agency renditions.
msnbc/ Newsweek ^
| April 24, 2006
| Mark Hosenball and Michael Isikoff
Posted on 04/24/2006 3:03:57 PM PDT by Roscoe Karns
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 361-362 next last
To: Publius
141
posted on
04/24/2006 4:04:08 PM PDT
by
Dog
(Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our enemies, justice will be done.)
To: Peach
This story really is frightening..I have only skimmed the surface of all that is out there..but this "matter of concience" is pure hokun..She did not resign and disclose..she got caught and was fired.
I have never thought she would be prosecuted..Color me cynical.
142
posted on
04/24/2006 4:04:28 PM PDT
by
MEG33
( GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
To: Howlin
Am I wrong, did she NOT confess? She DID confess
She confessed to leaking classified documents to reporters .. one of them being Dana Priest
Rand Beers and Newsweek are playing word games with regard to the Prison story
There is no confirmation on what she leaked .. But she DID leak
143
posted on
04/24/2006 4:05:49 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
To: Dog
They traced the leaker by using the computerized audit trail...of who looked at which documents....hehehe..Course she was in the IG department so she was just looking to check up on others...../MSM spin....
To: dead; RKV
145
posted on
04/24/2006 4:06:36 PM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Dog
Here is what interests me.
Mr. Helgerson likewise submitted to the lie-detector test, they said. But Mr. Helgerson's status as the independent inspector general a post to which he was appointed by the president and from which only the president can remove him makes his submission to a polygraph even more unusual.
146
posted on
04/24/2006 4:06:44 PM PDT
by
mware
(American's in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
To: STARWISE
The background of the authors of this piece is noteworthy:
Faulty Sources Isikoff & MSM previously used: Karen Kwiatkowski & Patrick Lang (Post 31)
In the beginning were Phil Agee and Mark Hosenball, two American journalists working in London. Agee is ex-CIA and Hosenball's father had "State Department connections". They wrote in 1975 in Time Out about GCHQ Cheltenham - the UK Signals Intelligence outfit which, astonishingly, had remained an unmentionable secret for three decades. The US and UK governments were not amused. Labour Home Secretary (Minister of the Interior) Rees decided to deport Agee and Hosenball.
See original of Post 31 for links and additional details.
147
posted on
04/24/2006 4:06:59 PM PDT
by
Fedora
To: Dog
Note the use of HE....and notice he was CAUGHT leaking.... Sounds like Mary will have a roommate in her prison cell
oops .. they don't do co-ep prisons
148
posted on
04/24/2006 4:07:22 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
To: Peach
I believe it's not only a shadow government, but was planned long before Clinton left the presidency in order to make a sort of placesaver for Hillary in a few years.The biggger question is: Do you also believe that President Bush was/is unaware of that plan?
149
posted on
04/24/2006 4:09:06 PM PDT
by
arasina
(So there.)
To: Grampa Dave
1 down and a lot more to go.
150
posted on
04/24/2006 4:09:15 PM PDT
by
jocko12
To: mware
I suspect Rand is up to his neck in this. So if she leaked to Rand, and then he carried it to the WaPo, she could 'categorically' deny leaking to the WaPo.
They really believe we're all idiots.
151
posted on
04/24/2006 4:09:25 PM PDT
by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: Peach
Wow! Good catch, Peach. Especially this quote-"Although well intentioned, that provision is overbroad and may unnecessarily chill legitimate activities that are at the heart of a democracy."
You are correct,it looks like long term planning..
152
posted on
04/24/2006 4:10:41 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(Kerry-Mcarthy in 2008!)
To: arasina
So biggg, in fact, that it required 3 gs. pffft
153
posted on
04/24/2006 4:10:44 PM PDT
by
arasina
(So there.)
To: Mo1
oops .. they don't do co-ep prisons LOL...Maybe they'll make an exception, they deserve each other. :-)
j
154
posted on
04/24/2006 4:10:48 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(-- Married a WAC in '65 and I'm still reenlisting. :-)
To: DCPatriot
I think there are laws that prohibit profiting from crimes.
She could not make a dime on any circuit because she would be prohibited from speaking in any manner about her activities.
Part of the plea bargain as well.
Just listen to Larry Johnson and see how close he comes to the line without ever crossing it. He is a bitter socialist but not stupid.
155
posted on
04/24/2006 4:10:52 PM PDT
by
Prost1
(Sandy Berger can steal, Clinton can cheat, but Bush can't listen!)
To: jocko12
The prison at Leavenworth is not big enough to hold all of them.
156
posted on
04/24/2006 4:11:09 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(There's a dwindling market for Marxist homosexual lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
To: backhoe
157
posted on
04/24/2006 4:11:50 PM PDT
by
MEG33
( GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
To: jazusamo
I have to admit I find it very interesting that Rand Beers weighed in on this story
158
posted on
04/24/2006 4:13:16 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
To: TC Rider
If Rand and McCarthy are trying to play it like that, then they are facing CONSPIRACY CHARGES TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE. I suspect the investigators are on to this and they are watching these traitors very, very closely.
159
posted on
04/24/2006 4:13:24 PM PDT
by
jrooney
(CIA traitors)
To: Roscoe Karns
"The fired official, Mary O. McCarthy, categorically denies being the source of the leak, one of McCarthys friends and former colleagues, Rand Beers, said Monday after speaking to McCarthy."
This must be the official version, as vetted by the Clintonites. It didn't take long for Beers to call up Isikoff, did it?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 361-362 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson