Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jveritas
"Second, what do you expect me to do when I find a document like this one? Not translated because it is still a very debatable point?"
If you feel up to it translate it. I in no way criticize your judgement in deciding what ones should be translated. You are providing a valuable service in building an english version database up for us all to use in the present and future to prove much of the original Intel was close or on the mark.
If my wording in some way appeared critical of your efforts please do accept my full apology. My last comment was to attempt an answer concerning the number of tubes if they where to be used as rockets, in that perhaps it really was not an un-realistic number. Then threw in a few points we all could dismiss, accept, or stay neutral on.
I continue to salute your efforts. Believe me.
95 posted on 04/24/2006 12:48:50 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Marine_Uncle
I greatly appreciate your comments and support. However if you link at what some freepers posted on this thread about Powell statements on these Aluminum tubes, it makes me think more and more that they were not intended for conventional 81 mm rockets.
113 posted on 04/24/2006 1:14:05 PM PDT by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson