Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird

"By 59 he should have saved enough so that he could retire. Then it wouldn't really matter if he were laid off. His savings should have been enough for your food, clothing, health insurance, and whatever fun he wants to have. Your home should be paid off by then."
~~~~~~~~~~
That is cold response, since you have no idea of the circumstances of this man's life. If you have been fortunate enough to have lived your life with no unexpected health costs and if you are not responsible for the help or care of family members and if you have never been broadsided by any kind of unexpected tragedy, then I am delighted for you. But for you to state that "by 59, he SHOULD have saved enough" for an unexpected downsizing is assuming much that you do not know.


356 posted on 04/23/2006 3:53:23 PM PDT by OkeyDokeyOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: All

Well we should all try to save more. Beating up on people who haven't done well, without knowing individual circumstances is counter-productive IMO. What is important is that today is not to late to start.


358 posted on 04/23/2006 3:57:52 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson