You didn't answer any of the questions. You gave some bogus vague "reasonable regulation" garbage.
If you're going to base your argument on "reasonableness," that's stupid--it proves my point--reasonableness is subjective. If the People of the State of South Carolina think that a reasonable regulation on the sale of dildos is to ban the sale, then who are we to question that?
You can't draw a line based on reasonableness. That's madness; there would be a million different lines based on a million different views of what is reasonable. Can't work.
If the People of the State of South Carolina think that a reasonable regulation on the sale of boots is to ban the sale (you might kick someone to death), you would support that?
Where do you draw the line?