Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JeffAtlanta

Jeff, I agree--but presumably, if, as Tpaine said, it is unconstitutional to pass a law banning the sale of dildos, there must be some text in the constitution that supports this.

If you claim it is "unenumerated," I'll point you to my above post, #112 and ask you the same question--where do you draw the line? And how do you rationally and logically draw it?


123 posted on 04/23/2006 10:42:01 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: Publius Valerius
Jeff, I agree--but presumably, if, as Tpaine said, it is unconstitutional to pass a law banning the sale of dildos, there must be some text in the constitution that supports this.

So by your logic a state could ban sex between married adults and it would be perfectly constitutional.

124 posted on 04/23/2006 10:43:45 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson