Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius Valerius; JeffAtlanta
On certain issue, like the degree of socialism within the government, that's ok. But on freedom issues, it's a different story.
79 JeffAtlanta

Val wrote:
No, it's not a different story. This is the idea of Federalism -- South Carolina isn't enslaving anyone and they haven't put up guards at the border to keep people from leaving.
So tell me again, how is their freedom affected?

You want to own or buy an 'assault weapon'?

Don't Drive to California -- they can legally prohibit them according to a lot of so-called 'conservative' FReepers.

Are you one Val?

100 posted on 04/23/2006 9:46:38 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine

That's right--California has the right to do that--that's why I don't live there, or Chicago, or New York. I like guns, I own several.

It really works out well--the People of the State of California want to ban guns, I want to own a gun, so I don't live there. What's the problem here?

There's a real simple solution: you want to own an assault weapon? There are like 45 other states to live in.

Where is it again that the right to sell dildos exists in the Constitution?


108 posted on 04/23/2006 9:57:02 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson