Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pharmboy
I'm for democracy, but imposing democracy is an oxymoron.

Somebody needs to explain to this nitwit the difference between a democracy and a representative republic.

11 posted on 04/23/2006 5:53:08 AM PDT by quantim (If the Constitution were perfect, it wouldn't have included the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: quantim
This idea is repeated often, but it needs to be challenged. "imposing democracy is an oxymoron. People have to choose democracy, and it has to come up from below." First, we are doing something very much like we did after WWII in Germany, Japan, and Korea, and they have worked well enough to say that democracy can be imposed. But, more important, we have never gone in anywhere where we weren't being urged to support one side over another.

Moreover, the realpolitique she espouses is not a progressive idea, but had its origins in the Congress of Vienna 1815 which was a reactionary defense of the old order after the French Revolution. We saw after 9/11 that it had brought us allies we didn't agree with, especially Saudi Arabia.

29 posted on 04/23/2006 6:45:00 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson