Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Recovering_Democrat
http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/peak_oil/is_peak_oil_a_myth.htm

Finally, a word of caution on the essential fragility of a study on the very long-term future for the world's energy supply which accepts without question the validity of the original 18th century hypothesis that all oil and gas resources have been generated from biological matter in the chemical and thermodynamic environments of the earth's crust.

There is an alternative theory - already 50 years old - which suggests an inorganic origin for additional oil and gas. This alternative view is widely accepted in the countries of the former Soviet Union where, it is claimed, "large volumes of hydrocarbons are being produced from the pre-Cambrian crystalline basement". Recent applications of the inorganic theory have, however, also led to claims for the possibility of the Middle East fields being able to produce oil "forever" and to the concept of repleting oil and gas fields in the gulf of Mexico.

More generally, it is argued, "all giant fields are most logically explained by inorganic theory because simple calculations of potential hydrocarbon contents in sediments shows that organic materials are too few to supply the volumes of petroleum involved."

There have been numerous reports in recent times, of oil and gas fields not running out at the expected time, but instead showing a higher content of hydrocarbons after they had already produced more than the initially estimated amount. This has been seen in the Middle East, in the deep gas wells of Oklahoma, on the Gulf of Mexico coast, and in other places. It is this apparent refilling during production that has been responsible for the series of gross underestimate of reserves that have been published time and again, the most memorable being the one in the early seventies that firmly predicted the end of oil and gas globally by 1987, a prediction which produced an energy crisis and with that a huge shift in the wealth of nations. Refilling is an item of the greatest economic significance, and also a key to understanding what the sources of all this petroleum had been. It is also of practical engineering importance, since we may be able to exercise some control over the refilling process.

The debate about the origin of all the petroleum on Earth lies in the center of the subject. If we really knew that it is only biological materials, which, in their decay, could produce hydrocarbons, then the quantities that could ever be produced would be limited by the biological content of the sediments. But then the clear and strong association of petroleum with the inert gas helium would have no explanation; the finding of hydrocarbon gases, liquids and solids on most other planetary bodies in our solar system which have surface conditions quite unsuitable for surface life, could not be understood; the presence of hydrocarbons which we now find in abundance in basement rocks would also remained unexplained.

19 posted on 04/22/2006 3:55:19 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Oh, for the days when "disrespect" was just a noun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: beyond the sea
Carefull, any claims contrary to the "fossil fuel" theory will bring out the attack dogs around here. Regardless, there is overwelming evidence that rock oil is indeed how oil is produced. at what rate we don't know. There are people here that think it's too hot at those depths for oil to be made, but what they don't know is deep hole testing proves that temperatures decrease after certain depths, the whole theory of earth core-layer composition isn't what "scientists" thought it was.

Mysteries of the Inner Earth

33 posted on 04/22/2006 4:12:07 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: beyond the sea
I vaguely remember an article in National Geographic that discusses this theory. However, the presence of microbes in deep rocks may mean that they act as an catalytic agent. I have read that the total weight of microbes exceeded the total weight of all more complex living things. BUT is that enough to explain the sheer quantity of organic minerals? Don't know.
181 posted on 04/22/2006 4:39:01 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson