Skip to comments.
Immunology in the spotlight at the Dover 'Intelligent Design' trial
Nature Immunology ^
| May 6, 2006
| Andrea Bottaro, Matt A Inlay & Nicholas J Matzke
Posted on 04/21/2006 9:17:58 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300, 301-318 last
To: tallhappy
Again, you don't seem to know what gene means compared to genome.On the contrary, you don't seem to appreciate that the genome is made up of genes, and sometimes, but not always, a substantial amount of other material.
To: tallhappy
Again, you don't seem to know what gene means compared to genome.On the contrary, you don't seem to appreciate that the genome is made up of genes, and sometimes, but not always, a substantial amount of other material.
To: tallhappy
Please, try to be stay on subject (as you have at times) and refrain from speciousnessHAHAHAHA! This, from a guy who routinely doles out personal attacks, unsolicited personal advice, etc. etc..
To: tallhappy
I agree, which is why I wrote "doesn't seem".You fail basic logic. We don't know whether or not coding region differences are sufficient to account for all the differences between species. This does not mean that it doesn't seem that they are sufficient.
To: PatrickHenry
Can you put me on your ping list? (I should have asked a long time ago)
305
posted on
04/26/2006 3:02:23 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Don't call them "Illegal Aliens." Call them what they are: CRIMINAL INVADERS!)
To: tallhappy
This is irrelevant, becuase nobody has argued that transposons don't drive a lot of evolutionary change. What we have been arguing is whether they are a useful way of analyzing evolution, and constitute the major part of genomic analysis.
Comment #307 Removed by Moderator
Comment #308 Removed by Moderator
To: HappyFeet
Does the pseudo hypothesis of evolution expect rational and intelligent people to believe this nonsense?You're not claiming to be a rational and intelligent person, are you?
Comment #310 Removed by Moderator
To: Right Wing Professor
This is irrelevant, becuase nobody has argued that transposons don't drive a lot of evolutionary change. What we have been arguing is whether they are a useful way of analyzing evolution Hmmm, one might think that a good way to analyze evolution would be to analyze things that drive evolutionary change (as you now say you aren't arguing).
311
posted on
04/26/2006 3:43:16 PM PDT
by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: HappyFeet
"The hypothesis of evolution is a bunch of crap, not even believable by children."
And yet it is accepted by almost every working scientist, except for a few loony eccentrics. Odd how that happened.
I wonder what recycled creo-troll you are. This was your first crevo thread, and yet you started as obnoxiously as any seasoned creo-warrior. That you Zeeba? We'll be watching you. :)
312
posted on
04/26/2006 4:21:10 PM PDT
by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
Comment #313 Removed by Moderator
314
posted on
04/26/2006 4:55:31 PM PDT
by
js1138
(somewhere, some time ago, something happened, but whatever it was, wasn't evolution)
To: tallhappy
We know that change occurs. You don't even need to know the underlying cause of change in order to describe it and quantify it.
Evolution is about those changes that affect reproductive success.
315
posted on
04/26/2006 4:58:15 PM PDT
by
js1138
(somewhere, some time ago, something happened, but whatever it was, wasn't evolution)
To: HappyFeet
"I did not start this thread. Someone else did."
I didn't say you started this thread. I said that it was the first crevo thread you have ever posted to (under this name anyway). You've only signed up here within the last week. I was commenting on the wonderfully friendly tone you chose to initiate this Freep name with on the crevo threads.
Not an auspicious start.
316
posted on
04/26/2006 9:25:26 PM PDT
by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
To: HappyFeet
hypothesis of evolution is a bunch of crap, not even believable by children
Maybe at one time the hypothesis of evolution might have held some truth to a few people, but it certainly does not ring true now (except maybe to a few people) some with science degrees
W.
317
posted on
04/27/2006 1:27:22 AM PDT
by
RunningWolf
(Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
To: HappyFeet
The hypothesis of evolution is a bunch of crap, not even believable by children. You are clearly neither rational nor informed. First, you think incorrectly renaming the thing you're criticizing amounts to scoring a point against it. Second, you are ignorant of the undisputed fact that the vast majority of scientists, people who actually know some biology, do subscribe to the theory of evolution.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300, 301-318 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson