Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dennisw
The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the firing.

Anyone else find this slightly ironic?
20 posted on 04/21/2006 4:41:52 PM PDT by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kenth
The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the firing.

Was the firing classified? Personel matters that do not involve covert agents are not secret. Any more than if a cop gets fired for breaking the law. The fact that you are not authorized to discuss something does not mean it is illegal to discuss it. It just means you boss may be ticked if you do.

In this case McCarthy was with internal affairs. Her job was to catch leakers and traitors. She apparently is a leaker herself.

I suspect that Portor Goss has put in a sting unit to catch the crooked CIA people. And if I were looking for leakers, internal affairs would be a good place to start.

28 posted on 04/21/2006 4:49:45 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: kenth
Anyone else find this slightly ironic?

Why? The sources of this traitor's name are not divulging classified information.

130 posted on 04/21/2006 6:41:56 PM PDT by MamaLucci (Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson