Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: michigander
If you set that scenario up as a possible course of reaction to heckling (killing a batch of people for their livers), not only didn't pride kill but, why should we as a country deal with an asshole like you?

So what if pride didn't really kill them? The result is you lost the chance to persuade a foreign government to change policy. And you have zero chance of doing it in the future, whether it is you or them that refuses to talk.

Do you think the protester's message was for either President Bush or Hu? Think again. They were both already quite aware of the issue. No, her goal was to hijack the event as a PR stunt. And while she attained her goal of getting it in the news, she damaged her own cause in the process. The Chinese government will never change policy if the perception is they did it in response to protests. The only chance is if a solution can be worked out that lets them initiate the change under the pretense of their own best interests. However, activists regardless of their cause rarely take this into account in their quest to 'piss people off into submission'.

147 posted on 04/21/2006 2:35:21 PM PDT by Antonello (Oh my God, don't shoot the banana!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: Antonello
The result is you lost the chance to persuade a foreign government to change policy.

A foreign government that would gift wrap a batch of human livers as a present to you?
How would a foreign government that would do something like that be persuaded to change any policy?

149 posted on 04/21/2006 2:52:22 PM PDT by michigander (The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson