http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1619945/posts
SEN. KERRY: Well, I read that. I don't know whether she did it or not so it's hard to have a view on it. Here's my fundamental view of this, that you have somebody being fired from the CIA for allegedly telling the truth, and you have no one fired from the white house for revealing a CIA agent in order to support a lie. That underscores what's really wrong in Washington, DC Here.
Maybe he should consider this little item:
EU official: No evidence of illegal CIA action
Antiterror chief advises committee
De Vries told the committee no EU-US agreement authorized secret renditions of terror suspects, that hundreds of CIA flights did not occur over Europe as reported by various media organizations, and that he has no news of European countries using intelligence obtained under torture.
(Of course, as can be seen from the rest of that article some Members of the European Parliament (the Toy Parliament) and others are not satisfied with Mr de Vries' statement, but that is where the case stands at the moment.)
***I don't know whether she did it or not so it's hard to have a view on it.***
What part of CONFESSION is it this dumb--- doesn't understand???
What would Kerry like? To have everyone with a clearance or who handles classified information leaking to the press? How is the government supposed to function in that situation? There are perfectly good and valid reasons why the government doesn't divulge classified information.