To: Mo1; All
Good grief.
Have you seen the new headline story at the WaPo?
New Plans Foresee Fighting Terrorism Beyond War Zones
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has approved the military's most ambitious plan yet to fight terrorism around the world and retaliate more rapidly and decisively in the case of another major terrorist attack on the United States, according to defense officials. The long-awaited campaign plan for the global war on terrorism, as well as two subordinate plans also approved within the past month by Rumsfeld, are considered the Pentagon's highest priority, according to officials familiar with the three documents who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about them publicly.
Details of the plans are secret...For example, SOCOM has dispatched small teams of Army Green Berets and other Special Operations troops to U.S. embassies in about 20 countries in the Middle East, Asia, Africa and Latin America, where they do operational planning and intelligence gathering to enhance the ability to conduct military operations where the United States is not at war....
To: Timeout
I don't think I have ever hated anyone but I'm truly getting close. These people don't care what they do to this country. It's all about political agendas and many of them work for the MSM and/or married to them.
2,189 posted on
04/22/2006 7:37:18 PM PDT by
kcvl
To: Timeout
Could be just another sting article.
2,195 posted on
04/22/2006 7:40:50 PM PDT by
Crawdad
(So the guy says to the doctor, "It hurts when I do this.")
To: Timeout
according to officials familiar with the three documents who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about them publicly.
The three are either suffering from galactic stupidity, or this was administration-authorized.
2,204 posted on
04/22/2006 7:45:49 PM PDT by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
To: Timeout
This has got to stop. Reports like this can very well cost the lives of some of these troops.
2,208 posted on
04/22/2006 7:46:59 PM PDT by
jazusamo
(-- Married a WAC in '65 and I'm still reenlisting. :-)
To: Timeout
"This plan details "what terrorists or bad guys we would hit if the gloves came off. The gloves are not off,"said one official, who asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the subject."
This article (and leak) would seem to be an attempt to forestall a more aggressive stance in the WOT?? Will be interesting to see if the Demagogues take on this as a new club with which to beat Rumsfeld. But I thought that Kerry, Hillary, and friends were calling for a more vigorous prosecution of the WOT?? Why haven't we taken the gloves off yet?? Because the 'Rats and MSM have worked with great energy can dedication to tie up the administration with domestic verbal attacks to make it politically impossible to take on any new targets in the WOR. Still, we shouldn't forget that some Democrats have called for a doubling of the size of SOCOM forces (without any conception of what would be involved or the probable dilution of focus and quality that could result).
2,266 posted on
04/22/2006 8:31:07 PM PDT by
Enchante
(Democrats: "We are ALL broken and worn out, our party & ideas, what else is new?")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson