Posted on 04/21/2006 12:01:43 PM PDT by Howlin
Edited on 04/21/2006 12:47:23 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
if the allegations are true???
I guess Larry missed the part where Mary confessed, huh?
Here's the link: The Firing of Mary McCarthy
Typhoid Mary McChristmas
I've practically been in this thread most of the day in between cleaning house, and haven't heard a word of news all day.
I'm exhausted. I stayed here too late last night.
=== placemark ===
Thanks for the link ... sorry it took so long for me to see it ... lots of pings today
The possibility of abuse to savage terrorists and enemies is ALWAYS their top concern ... not this country, certainly not our brave troops or Americans. May they rot in hell for eternity. I keep getting this very paranoid thought that maybe her firing is also part of their scheme ... that this was all part of a sinister scheme. Am I totally losing it?? How could she possibly believe she wouldn't get caught??
My opinion --- she was near retirement, she was 'trusted' and she believed she was above suspicion primarily because men are most often suspected of treason. Bet that polygraph shocked the hell out of her.
There are lots of people who think they won't get caught at something
she was close to retiring .. maybe she thought she could get away with it
Then there are others who have extra baggage in their closet and it's being used against them to get information
Who really know why people do these things against their country .. in a time of war
Whatever their reasons ... it's wrong
Well, think of how many 'Rat leakers don't ever get caught..... as several articles have said, this firing seems to be 'unprecedented' for the CIA, despite all the other b.s. from there the past several years.
I hate cleaning the whole house, cuz it's an all-day thing for me, as my feet and ankles get sore which makes my ambition wear off real quick. I really should consider doing a little bit each day, then my feet, ankles, and knees won't kill me for it. That's the cross I bear for being physically disabled.
Anyway. Will catch up with you tomorrow. Nite-nite!
You could be right.
But she is not covered by whistleblower laws and she is subject to prosecution. So what is the plan on that, then? She wants to be prosecuted? Then drag the government through some kind of embarrassing court case?
I think the key is, does she rat out the other leakers or who is behind this cabal, in order to save her skin? If so, then I doubt this getting caught was part of her plan.
How could she doubt she WOULD get caught? The CIA has been out of control for many years. Could it be they thought they would just continue to get away with it?
Right. The whole left-wing should rot in hell.
For raw entertainment value, read some of the posts below Larry Johnson's piece, the ravings of various mentally unstable leftist loons, and with idiotic responses (ALL IN CAPS) by Larry Johnson after some of them. It's hilarious.
HOW did you know I am reading 'em?
LOL!
David Gregory -- Beth Wilkinson, attorney, former Clintonite.
Matt Cooper -- Mandy Grunwald, Clintonite (isn't her father some Democrat mucky-muck?).
Dana Priest -- Bill Goodfellow.
Okay, now I have a headache!
GOOD idea!
I recall such a list from years ago, but it's long lost.
What in the world is this??
http://www.law.uc.edu/archives/butlerdata/Box18.html
Johnson,"Mary never worked on the Operations side of the house. In other words, she never worked a job where she would have had first hand operational knowledge about secret prisons."
She failed a polygraph and confessed so if what Johnson is saying is true then someone fed her the info (true or not) knowing it would leak. Sounds like a good sting op to me. I would bet that little Mary has been discussing with the MSM other things too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.