Tree rings are assumptions? I really don't get the sense that you know what you're talking about.
The 'abilities' of Homo Erectus are not of the same type of evidence as written observations.
I don't know what that sentence is supposed to mean. Abilities?
You think tree rings go back millions of years? They don't go back more than a few thousand and that is assuming that they are matched correctly. Assumptions, assumptions.
'Abilities' = the purported tools that supposedly indicate tool-making supposedly indicating intelligence supposedly indicating the 'abilities' of this creature.
Assumption built upon interpretation built upon extrapolation.