Posted on 04/21/2006 5:02:43 AM PDT by FerdieMurphy
This oughta be good. Is the inclusion of Oliver North's input enough to engender more than a "the author is a lefty wacko for suggesting that Corporations remain patriotic to the nation that enables their existence" knee-jerk response? Let's watch and see!
The article kind of wanders across the spectrum, albeit making valid points at each stop. Ultimately, it settles on how corporations selectively choose to ignore laws and then arbitrarily attempts to assign blame.
The blame is rightfully placed on the shoulders of those at the top. When the President and members of Congress ignore the specifics of laws and refuse (for example) to enforce our immigration laws and national sovereignty, it is absurd to expect the rest of America to obey them. We have so many redundant laws currently on the books that, were all of them to be enforced uniformly, we would all be willing to risk death to escape to Cuba for the comparitve freedom we would enjoy in that nation.
The fact is that, in today's politicized and litigious climate, Congress would rather write another redundant law than require existing ones to be enforced. It's all about TV face time and getting re-elected, and NOT about serving the needs of the nation.
If this is so--it is not corporate America who should be getting North's attention, but the Bush administration, who should twist the arms of enforcement.
But, hey, maybe he's too busy surrendering to Mexico to enforce these laws?
The other shoe that'll hit the floor is when soldiers come back from Iraq and need entry-level jobs as well as more highly-paid ones--they'll be competing with illegal black-market labor. Think of the irony--doing one's duty and service and risking life and limb for his country, only to find that citizenship and nationality have no value at home.
Vincente's children will be at the head of the line, not ours.
There is one law that will be cited in this context: The law of capitalism. Super-capitalists have no allegiance to anything but dollars and "the fiduciary responsibility to the stockholder". The poor duped Americans that believe that by owning a few hundred shares of stock in an "American" company they actually have a voice in how that company is run are being scammed.
The idea that the very country that defends the existence of a corporation should expect some return other than taxes is absurd to the neo-super-capitalists. They believe they can ignore patriotism because patriotism in itself doesn't make a buck.
ping
If you can't beat out a non-english speaking, uneducated person from another country for a job, you have no job skills at all.
You'd never get hired anyway.
Mow your own lawn. And tell the ole lady to swab her own toilet.
"If you can't beat out a non-english speaking, uneducated person from another country for a job, you have no job skills at all. "
Ahh but their governments have been sending them to the US to get educated in our schools taking the slots required by our children.
I would guess you aren't working in an industry thats been impacted by offshoring, yet.
There is a question which bothers me, and please forgive this from a dumb foreigner. Has Bush become the Chirac of America?
Well, actually I do, but now you're making an anti-globalism objection.
That's a different issue, although there's not much to discuss. Globalism is inevitable as lesser-developed countries begin to modernize. Economics guarantee that jobs will shift to places that are the lowest cost producer of a satisfactory product.
There's no way to stop that, nor should we. With all the outsourcing and illegal immigration, folks like you should be complaining about the US unemployment rate of 22%. So something is wrong with your economic assumptions.
Chriac was better to us than Vicente on the WOT!!!
This is absolutely what is behind Bush's diving numbers--his surrender on illegal invasion. It'll erode his support for the WOT. I've been called twice by major polls in the past few years, and "approved" both times. I'm hoping I'll be called again to convey my deep disapproval of late. I'm surprised he even gets 30%.
Some say it's corporate influence, but I believe it is cultural and sentimental in nature. Bush was probably raised by Mexicans, maybe illegals--his Spanish is beautiful and his accent excellent. If he and his family have been waited on his whole life by illegal servants, he's probably on a guilt trip and wants you and me to buy the ticket.
It is a "dog-eat-dog" world. What's your point?
ping
They all watched Micheal Douglas play Gordon Gecko and thought that was what managing and being a corporate weenie was all about.
Multinational Corporations are by definition "one-worlders". That's why I try to patronize small-businesses or locally owned private companies for the majority of my needs. I'll patronize a multi-national only when there's no other choice.
".....the majority of the corporate executives are Baby Boomers. With that mentioned,......."
I believe you are incorrect about this. Many children of Baby Boomers are in their late thirties to early forties. A great many of them are in executive postitions. They are the ones who are actively engaged in the wholesale rejection of notions such as honor, duty, and faith, even more so than any anti-American from the 60s who might have reached a position of power in a business.
Sounds like one of my old bosses. I drove him nuts a lot of the time. He figured out that I would do the work, but the work would not be my life. He couldn't complain about my performance, but wrote me up on anything else. I once got a mark because my "desk was unprofessional". Never mind I had been on the road for months and didn't know that the electricians were using my desk to work on a few boards.
Really used to p#$$ me off, till I figured that he was making himself sick. Guy was trying so hard to rise up the ladder that he didn't have the health to enjoy it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.