Farah and Williams have been pushing their alarmist bullshit for the past two years or so. If bin laden had nukes he would strike. Nukes are perishable and prone to detection, so he certainly would not be sitting on them.
You said -- "Farah and Williams have been pushing their alarmist bullshit for the past two years or so. If bin laden had nukes he would strike. Nukes are perishable and prone to detection, so he certainly would not be sitting on them."
Apparently you think that the longer you have for a "warning" the less valid it is. That's some kind of logic. Kinda weird, actually....
If you have a warning -- the prudent thing is to follow it up. And if that warning is exactly what your enemy says that he is going to do to you -- then *doubly* you had better follow it up. And if your enemy has already attacked before and destroyed things -- then *triply* you had better follow it up.
Apparently you like to dismiss things from your enemies until they *accomplish* their task. I suppose then you'll say "I never saw it coming..."
Regards,
Star Traveler