Using terms like “Racism” is just away to stop discussion on the real issues. This is a liberal socialist trick to use name calling or saying something can’t be done to take the issues off the table. Besides, who is more racists Mexico that will not let anyone but native born to own property or American that is a melting pot. WE as Americans have to stand up to this propagandist socialist assault on us. Racism or who owned the property 150 years ago is IRRELEVANT. The issue is that people that have NO RIGHT to be in the USA are making demands on America. It would be as if you were waiting for a bus and watched as people got on the bus through the back door with out paying. HOW would you feel if the bus driver says that the bus is full and to wait for the next one? Or what if your already on the bus and those that come in the back door start coughing, and going thought the bus stealing purses and wallets. Would you be a racist to ask the bus driver to kick this criminals off the bus?
To say that We can’t (build a wall, kick out 12 million, stop those seeking a better life) are ways to take issues off the table. The response is why not or how many can we deport?
"Using terms like “Racism” is just away to stop discussion on the real issues. This is a liberal socialist trick to use name calling or saying something can’t be done to take the issues off the table."
It's a little more insidious than that. The typical liberal tactic to control a discussion is to berate and scream and talk over anyone they disagree with.
No, this is a more subtle tactic, from the media (and most likley the usual Mexican and US politician suspects), to garner SYMPATHY for the poor, poor illegals. Sniff. How DARE you.
Expect more. A LOT more. This same tactic was used by the Japanese in the 90s, when they were buying property in the US in record numbers, and running roughshod over US industry, back and coddled by weak and corrupt government officials and biased, paid off media types. We were called racist then, too, for criticizing the Japanese...and it worked. Michael Crighton even documented the idea and reality in a movie and book, "Rising Sun".
This is the same thing. The marches and protests failed to garner the support the activists, businesses, media, and government officials expected - in fact, it got the reverse, they found the polls swinging towards the majority of the populace saying "Hell NO" to the idea of amnesty for millions of illegals. People are coming forward and demanding the borders be closed, the laws upheld, and the illegals dealt with.
So, they're now trying the "racist' card...but I think it will fail, because of the very nature of their being here illegally. They'll continue to play it, they have been for weeks now, with the sob stories of 'poor Ramon and Esmerelda who live off old Whopper Wrappers in a refrigerator box in a rusty pool of water in a junkyard, and they share it with 20 others. They just want to work, do the jobs fat, lazy, slob Americans won't do."
I'm really interested in seeing what the reaction to their "boycott" May first will be. We had a similar day a while back in the Bay Area, and the only comment people had, was how nice the commute was since all the illegals stayed home.
It's subtle now, but it's going to get more strident and in-you-face in the near future. It's going to be hilarious watching the media defend these criminals, and try and make us feel guilty for not wanting them here.