Skip to comments.
2003 Document: Saddam Ordered To Treat The Arab Feedayeen Terrorists The Same As Iraqi Soldiers
Pentagon/FMSO Iraq Pre-War documents ^
| April 20 2006
| jveritas
Posted on 04/20/2006 2:00:22 PM PDT by jveritas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
To: tillacum
I am honored to be in the company of freepers.
41
posted on
04/20/2006 4:07:23 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(Hate can never win elections.)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK; jveritas; Grampa Dave
Turned on the TV , tired of Shep smith talking about Tabloid stuff, so surfed the channels and there was Chrissy Matthews arguing with Smedgt.(sp?) ...who says that the Valery Pflam , CIA leak is strictly a Belway event and doesn't amount to a hill of BEANS ....and the Volcano erupted...and my thought was...that Matthews doesn't have a clue about the stuff that JV is digging up!!!
To: GPMETRO
They are watching Chris Matthews,....he doesn't know about any of this either...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
44
posted on
04/20/2006 4:27:09 PM PDT
by
Stentor
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
One of these fine days Chrissy is going to go potty in his pants when the news of these translations finally break.
45
posted on
04/20/2006 4:30:37 PM PDT
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: jveritas
Well that ABSOLUTELY confirms that the Arab Feedayeen when mentioned in all the other documents is NOT the Saddam Feedayeen.
Now get some sleep jveritas! ;-)
46
posted on
04/20/2006 4:38:20 PM PDT
by
avacado
To: jveritas
wait, wait, wait, wait a second. John Kerry, Howard Dean and the Democrats all told us (after Bush was elected) that there were no terrorists in Iraq before we went in. They were in the USA, Canada, Mexico, Philipines, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Indonesia, Australia, German, The Netherlands, Chechnya, Moscow, Turkey, Morroco, Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, North Korea but NOT, definitley not in Iraq.
47
posted on
04/20/2006 4:38:21 PM PDT
by
jw777
To: Marine_Uncle
I want to be watching....
The guys that lit his fuse was a standin for the ex Reb congressman on MSNBC,,,can't seem to recall his name ...and is from Philly,...but he laid it on Chrissy real heavy and Chrissy said this business is with Joe Wilson is the MOST important thing because Bush took us to WAR over Saddam having the capability to cause a Mushroom Cloud and Bush lied...(I am paraphrasing there....).
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Your paraphrasing is adequate however. One of these days these lib goons are going to start eating crow once the news breaks on all Saddam had in place, just waiting for the sanctions to be lifted.
49
posted on
04/20/2006 4:52:21 PM PDT
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: jveritas
Question? On some documents under signature there is a name and on some under signature a number such as 28/2 and on some like this one it says Signature, then underneath just Staff General. Is there no actual name tied to these documents?
50
posted on
04/20/2006 4:59:53 PM PDT
by
Spunky
("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
To: Marine_Uncle
Now I remember the name,,.....Scarborough .(Sp?)...
To: onyx
52
posted on
04/20/2006 5:29:59 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(Hate can never win elections.)
To: Milligan
Not yet :) though millions of more documents to come, hopefully we will know the truth about this.
53
posted on
04/20/2006 5:31:08 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(Hate can never win elections.)
To: Grampa Dave
Good reply to Liberals GD.
54
posted on
04/20/2006 5:32:44 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(Hate can never win elections.)
To: avacado
55
posted on
04/20/2006 5:34:28 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(Hate can never win elections.)
To: jw777
Yep and these documents prove how much they were wrong.
56
posted on
04/20/2006 5:35:23 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(Hate can never win elections.)
To: Spunky
Many of them have name tied to the signature. However many of the intelligence documents use initials rather than full names when signing the letter.
57
posted on
04/20/2006 5:37:42 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(Hate can never win elections.)
To: jveritas
"However many of the intelligence documents use initials rather than full names when signing the letter.I understand that, but on some it just says Signature, then underneath (Chief General) and like this document it says Signature, then underneath (Staff General). No name or initials, or numbers. Was there no name/initials given on the originals?
58
posted on
04/20/2006 6:01:33 PM PDT
by
Spunky
("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
To: Spunky
No names assigned to signature in some of them. I guess in some cases they were supposed to know the name of the Director of the an Intelligence Directorate or the Chief of Staff, or some very high ranking military or intelligence personnel without there names been written, only a signature will suffice. Remember that those top secret memos were only read by few people who recognize each other signatures.
59
posted on
04/20/2006 6:06:51 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(Hate can never win elections.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Now I remember the name,,.....Scarborough .(Sp?)"
Can't place him. But that is ok. Like you said, Chrissy probably doesn't understand the Harmony Database translations are going to eventually put a totally different light on the whole deal.
60
posted on
04/20/2006 6:08:38 PM PDT
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson