Blatant editorializing.
If she wanted the students to be given immunity from the charges, then she would not be advising them to avoid the police.
They will obviously only be given immunity under one condition: that they testify against Jacobson.
She has a vested interest in them not being given immunity and in them not cooperating, as she has abundantly demonstrated.
I thought her E-mail was self-serving too. Even if the students are 100% pro-abortion, I hope they have the sense at this point to avoid this witch and her advice like the plague.
"She has a vested interest in them not being given immunity and in them not cooperating, as she has abundantly demonstrated."
Hmmmm...as she was in a position of authority, can anyone say suborning to criminal acts? Dispensing legal advice without a license? Subversion? RICO? Nice laundry list to THROW THE BOOK at her...and if the judges won't do it, we THROW THEM OUT.