Sex researchers predict the future (Mega Barf Alert!)

Bay Area Reporter (San Francisco) ^ | 20 April 2006 | Liz Highleyman

[martin_fierro]

[DBeers]

Homosexual Agenda Ping!

If you oppose the homosexualization of society
-add yourself to the ping list!

To be included in or removed from the
HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA PING LIST,
please FReepMail either DBeers or DirtyHarryY2k.

Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search [ Add keyword = homosexualagenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

"We have seen the kind of role scholarship can play in informing judges and other public policymakers," he said, noting his own involvement as a historical expert in recent U.S. Supreme Court cases including Romer v. Evans (Colorado's Amendment 2) and Lawrence v. Texas. "The court cases show the degree to which the Christian right depends on ignorance of the history of gay and lesbian lives and experiences."

Scholarship? More like junk science premised propaganda financed by the Ford Foundation!

Another one for the BIZARRO file... ROTFLMAO

[rageaholic]

"hey babe-ee I'm a sex researcher"

[Publius6961]

"The need for sexuality studies will become even more urgent," predicted George Chauncey, director of the Lesbian and Gay Studies Project at the University of Chicago.

This is the ultimate irony. Sexuality and parenthood are inextricably linked; two sides of a single coin.
For those who, by definition, can never be parents in the normal natural sense, for them to discuss "sexuality" is, well... mind-boggling.

Tolerance is one thing, and was the only goal early on for the deviants.
For them to continue pretending that they are as normal as heterosexuals, the other 97% of human beings is... well, also mind-boggling. I suppose we can no longer assume we can ignore them and they will go away? The "muslims" of human sexuality?

[concerned about politics]

But, she wondered, is this a fad?

Yes. Today, teenagers use the words "gay/homosexual/fagot" to represent things that are weird, ugly, distasteful, or dysfunctional. If you call a fellow student "gay", you'll pay for it. It's one of the worst thing you can call them.

There are a few social losers who refer to themselves as "gay" occupying space in the schools who think being queer is still cool, but their days are numbered. They're quickly becoming freaks in the eyes of normal school kids.

This is a good thing, and parents have to keep working toward it until "gay" is as bad as smoking. Both are just as deadly, even though one destroys from the top and the other through the bottom.

[Dilbert San Diego]

Sheesh.............How in the Sam Hill did our ancestors ever survive and have children without sex researches telling them what to do?


How did our ancestors figure out the mysteries of sex? How did they figure out how to make it all work? They must have since we were all conceived and born. They did figure things out.

[concerned about politics]

"The need for sexuality studies will become even more urgent,"

It's either butt covering chastity belts for kids or school choice. Choose thou.

[Just another Joe]

"young peoples growing sense that they can transform their gender."

No, they cannot transform their gender.
They might be able to transform their sense of gender but not their gender.

[concerned about politics]

The homosexuals will ALWAYS be trying to indoctrinate the children, because adults won't stand for it
Where there's innocent kids, you'll find homosexuals.

[andy58-in-nh]

Hence the expression: Prick up your ears.

[Junior]

A "sexy" ping.

[cjshapi]

I guess you can get funding for anything these days!

[Tokra]

Where there's innocent kids, you'll find homosexuals

There are FAR more heterosexual child molesters than otherwise, so one could easily say "Where there's innocent kids, you'll find heterosexuals."

Your logic.

[Junior]

I'd love to be a "sex researcher." Can you just imagine the lab work?

[concerned about politics]

"gazed into the crystal ball"

I wonder which NAMBLA member it belonged to.

[iluvlucy]

Now that Gays have been normalized in all areas of public policy or they will turn their attention on the Children. The ground work is well underway. Example: Female school teachers having sex with adolescent boys is the first step in normalizing even younger and all sexual options. You can listen to any "conservative" radio talk show and hear plenty of "normal" and "respectable" "conservatives" justify a violation of authority by these teachers. The major objection to be found is whether the teacher is ugly or not.

There was a time when a College Professor would be canned for dating a student even if the student was older than the instructor. In that long forgotten time they understood the temptation for abuse and corruption such things fostered. The other students trust in the Professors grading of his or her students would be undermined. Today a hotty can do so to under age children and many "conservatives" claim there is no harm.

Is there any wonder what is next?

[CougarGA7]

Just another reason for me to stay away from Santa Fe. Between the rampant gay agenda and its sense of art...i.e.

Just don't go there.

[concerned about politics]

There are FAR more heterosexual child molesters than otherwise, so one could easily say "Where there's innocent kids, you'll find heterosexuals."

I disagree. Not only are the homosexuals where the children are, but they're demanding the legal right to easy access to them - in the name of tolerance , of course. Heterosexuals aren't out there waving flags are screamimg "let us in" like the homosexuals. The queers are blatant about their agenda.

[iluvlucy]

Gender applies to words not people. These people are stupid on many levels