Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Incorrigible

Doesn't sound like the healthiest situation. It seems like it would just reawaken grief more and more. If a loved one of yours died, would you want pictures of them right after they died? Granted, you would have other types of pictures. But, this just doesn't seem healthy.


5 posted on 04/20/2006 11:17:15 AM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Blogger

I think it is healthy as long as it doesn't take over the rest of one's life and remains in a balanced context.

Loosing a child is really tough. No matter how young it is.


28 posted on 04/20/2006 11:42:14 AM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Blogger
If a loved one of yours died, would you want pictures of them right after they died?

But, these parents didn't have a chance for a picture of a living child.

I've lost 3, only have an ultrasound of one - I totally understand, even though they were never born, they were still my children and still very much loved!!

32 posted on 04/20/2006 11:59:30 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Blogger
That's the point, you have nothing to remember these kids by; no memories, no pictures, just the hurt. I think it's healthy for these women to be channeling the pain into optimism. If they were too hard to look at, i don't think they would put the pictures up. But this recognizes that these babies are really people, who played a part, however small, in our lives.
38 posted on 04/20/2006 12:14:12 PM PDT by TrogdortheBurninator (Masters, remember that I am an ass: though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Blogger
"It's almost like proof," said Megan Senthil, an Aurora, Ohio, mother whose fourth child, Asher, was stillborn in February. "It's strange to go through nine months and have a life inside you and then have nothing. It makes it more real to me. Yeah, I did have a baby."

It seems "unhealthy" to you that a mother would want a picture of her child??? Trust me, it's nice to have when some blowhard makes a comment like "it isn't like you lost a real child", so you can whip it out show how amazingly "real" that blob of cells looked.

55 posted on 04/20/2006 1:05:18 PM PDT by workerbee (A person's a person no matter how small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Blogger
If a loved one of yours died, would you want pictures of them right after they died? Granted, you would have other types of pictures.

However, you have to remember that, unlike with Grandma's photos taken during her life, you have no other photos of this child. They either get the photo shortly after the death or never have a photo.

65 posted on 04/20/2006 4:23:24 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Blogger
Doesn't sound like the healthiest situation. It seems like it would just reawaken grief more and more. If a loved one of yours died, would you want pictures of them right after they died? Granted, you would have other types of pictures. But, this just doesn't seem healthy.

But with your loved one, chances are you have many pictures of them to hold on to. You have to think these are their children and the thought of not remembering for they looked like, as a mom of 3, is sad to me. I can certainly understand it. I would never want to forget what my child's face looked like, no matter how it looked. That child would be beautiful to me in that state and I would want to be able to see it's face from time to time.

73 posted on 04/20/2006 8:55:51 PM PDT by RepubMommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson