To: TypeZoNegative
A 'lie' is a knowingly false statement. This part is what the dimbulbs won't acknowledge. Bush may have been wrong (which I don't think he was) about the WMD (quantities, composition, location, etc.)but to assert that he 'lied' when what we didn't find what we expected to be there is deception on their part, pure and simple. What was the amount of yellowcake in Iraq that the UN had documented? I seem to recall around 600 tons. What did they use that for? Paint pigment? Yeah, right!
10 posted on
04/20/2006 11:15:52 AM PDT by
GW and Twins Pawpaw
(Sheepdog for Five [My grandkids are way more important than any lefty's feelings!])
To: GW and Twins Pawpaw
Remember the dem outrage when Al Qaqaa was raided?
14 posted on
04/20/2006 11:25:09 AM PDT by
AliVeritas
(Enforcement: A job Americans would do (a typical Foxette))
To: GW and Twins Pawpaw
A 'lie' is a knowingly false statement.
And all we know for sure about the WMD's is that we don't know where they are PERIOD. That does not mean that they never existed or that they were somehow destroyed by the
Slickster and his Cruse missile strikes. It was on Saddam to account for the weapons as per the ninety one cease fire agreement. He did not and had no intention of ever doing so. He will swing from a rope around his neck for this
miscalculation.
50 posted on
04/23/2006 7:31:06 PM PDT by
SAWTEX
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson