Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Disarmament board chooses Iranian (Iran Now Vice Chair of U.N. Disarmament Commission)
The Jerusalem Post ^ | 19 April 2006 / Updated 20 April 2006 | ATHAN GUTTMAN

Posted on 04/20/2006 9:28:00 AM PDT by anotherview

Apr. 19, 2006 22:32 | Updated Apr. 20, 2006 6:14
Disarmament board chooses Iranian
By NATHAN GUTTMAN
WASHINGTON

As the international community looks into ways of stopping Iran from developing nuclear weapons, an Iranian representative was elected to be the vice chair of the UN's disarmament commission.

The commission, which began its annual conference last week, was established by the UN General Assembly in the early 50's in order to promote disarmament and to review international treaties dealing with nuclear energy.

The commission does not have any authority to enforce its decisions and is not connected to the International Atomic Energy Agency, which is the international nuclear watchdog that is now investigating Iran's nuclear program and is expected to report to the UN Security Council by the end of the month.

The new Iranian vice chair, Mehdi Danesh-Yazdi, who is also the country's ambassador to the UN, said last week that Iran will cooperate with the IAEA and will "seek an acceptable venue for holding transparent talks with interested parties." The ambassador, who is one of three vice-chairpersons, said during the meeting of the commission that Israel's nuclear stockpile is among "the major sources of concern with regard to global peace and security."

The election of Iran to the senior post in the disarmament commission drew sharp criticism from US lawmakers and from Jewish organizations that are fighting against a nuclear Iran.

Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), who heads the House subcommittee on the Middle East issued a statement in which she compared the decision to "appointing a serial killer to serve as a juror in a murder trial."

Ros-Lehtinen added that choosing Iran to be the vice chair of the commission proves that the UN and the international community are "ineffective in preventing Iran from achieving nuclear capabilities."

The American Jewish Congress' chairman Jack Rosen said that the vote in the disarmament committee amounts to "a rude slap in the face of the International Atomic Energy Agency and the UN Security Council."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: disarmament; iran; un; uninsanity; unitednations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: concerned about politics

Since I posted this I obviously do see the same things wrong with this that you do. How do we change it? In Israel I don't know of one political party in the Knesset which has advocated pulling out of the U.N. In the U.S. Republicans seem to support the U.N. as well. Why????


21 posted on 04/20/2006 9:49:45 AM PDT by anotherview ("Ignorance is the choice not to know" -Klaus Schulze)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
Is the UN also stuck on stupid?

No, we are. For continuing to fund them.

22 posted on 04/20/2006 9:53:02 AM PDT by workerbee (A person's a person no matter how small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: anotherview

STOP THE MADNESS!!!!!!!1


23 posted on 04/20/2006 9:55:35 AM PDT by visualops (www.visualops.com ...Crime shouldn't pay: support LEGAL immigration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anotherview
Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL)...compared the decision to "appointing a serial killer to serve as a juror in a murder trial."

Yeah, his own trial.

It is simply the cold truth that there are a lot of people stupid enough to believe that a nuclear-armed Iran is a good idea. It's the price paid for decades of anti-U.S. and anti-colonial propaganda among the internationalists and there is absolutely no indication that anything is changing. The consensus among these internationalists is that Israel destroyed is also a good idea because it will serve as an object lesson to those who think that a single country may defy international - meaning their - opinions.

This particular action was a deliberate, gratuitous, and ultimately counterproductive slap in the face to all of the West, not just the U.S. This particular branch of the UN isn't all that different from the rest of it, just a little more brazen.

24 posted on 04/20/2006 10:00:51 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anotherview

With the First Pick in the 2006 United Nations Draft the Disarmament Board Selects: Terrorist, Islamic Republic of Iran, from the Middle East.


25 posted on 04/20/2006 10:02:56 AM PDT by SelectiveJNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anotherview

The UN? FM!


26 posted on 04/20/2006 10:03:26 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

"Or like putting OJ in charge of battered women's problems and solutions."

HAHA! Got to love OJ!


27 posted on 04/20/2006 10:06:07 AM PDT by SelectiveJNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SelectiveJNJ

The Human Rights Commission is now on the clock!


28 posted on 04/20/2006 10:07:20 AM PDT by SelectiveJNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Steelerfan
Only the UN can be this monumentally stupid

Only the US can be this monumentally Stupid, after all we supply the forum for this madness.

29 posted on 04/20/2006 10:08:00 AM PDT by itsahoot (Any country that does not control its borders, is not a country. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

You are definately not alone.


30 posted on 04/20/2006 10:10:15 AM PDT by IrishMike (Dry Powder is a plus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

I think Bolton is changing the tone somewhat, but you are right that we aid and abet this nonsense.


31 posted on 04/20/2006 11:53:21 AM PDT by Steelerfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
Is the UN also stuck on stupid?

Nope, but they like lucrative oil contracts. Ask Saddam. My bet is on the baksheesh...

Follow the money!

32 posted on 04/20/2006 3:25:38 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
"..stuck on stupid..." Your being too kind.

The UN has to be the most corrupt, impotent, and irrelevant bunch of clowns I've ever seen!

Proving once again that not everything in nature has a purpose.

33 posted on 04/20/2006 5:54:34 PM PDT by OnRightOnLeftCoast (U.S.: Voluntary laws and policies assuring self-destruction - civilizations die from suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson