Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq PM Lets Shiites Consider Replacement
Las Vegas Sun ^ | April 20, 2006 at 8:26:22 PDT | QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA ASSOCIATED PRESS

Posted on 04/20/2006 9:24:23 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, under intense pressure to give up plans for a second term, agreed Thursday to let Shiite lawmakers reconsider his nomination, a step that could mark a breakthrough in the months-long effort to form a new government.

Key to al-Jaafari's change of heart was pressure from U.N. envoy Ashraf Qazi and his meetings Wednesday with the most powerful Shiite cleric in the country, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, and Muqtada al-Sadr, a radical cleric who has backed al-Jaafari, said Kurdish lawmaker Mahmoud Othman.

"There was a signal from Najaf," Othman said, referring to al-Sistani's office in the Shiite holy city. "Qazi's meetings with (al-Sistani) and al-Sadr were the chief reason that untied the knot."

Shiite legislators planned to meet Saturday to decide whether to replace al-Jaafari, who faced fierce opposition from Iraq's Kurdish and Sunni Arab parties.

A planned session of the Iraqi parliament aimed at trying to jump-start the formation of a new government also was delayed until Saturday.

The U.S. and Britain have been pressing hard for the Iraqis to break the deadlock over al-Jaafari's nomination that has persisted since Dec. 15 elections, preventing the creation of a government at a time of increasing sectarian violence.

Among those mentioned as replacements for al-Jaafari were Jawad al-Maliki, spokesman for the prime minister's Dawa party, and another leading Dawa politician Ali al-Adeeb.

Sunni and Kurdish parties blamed the incumbent for worsening the tensions - with Sunnis refusing to back al-Jaafari because his government allegedly allowed Shiite militias to infiltrate the Iraqi police and carry out reprisal killings against Sunnis.

Kurds also believed al-Jaafari had broken promises to support their claims in the oil-rich area of Kirkuk. The Kurds want to incorporate the area into their three-province self-governing region.

Al-Jaafari won the alliance nomination two months ago by only one vote, beating Vice President Adil Abdul-Mahdi with al-Sadr's support.

Stepping up the pressure earlier this month, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw flew to Baghdad and demanded quick action to resolve the impasse. However, several Iraqi figures complained the U.S. and British intervention had prompted al-Jaafari's supporters to dig in their heels against what many Iraqis considered foreign interference.

President Bush also urged the Iraqis to "step up and form a unity government so that those who went to the polls to vote recognize that a government will be in place to respond to their needs."

It was unclear what prompted al-Jaafari to clear the way for a replacement, only a day after he had repeated his steadfast refusal to step down. His Shiite coalition had been reluctant to reconsider his nomination for fear of splintering the alliance.

Al-Maliki told reporters that "circumstances and updates had occurred" prompting al-Jaafari to refer the nomination back to the alliance "so that it take the appropriate decision."

Bassem Sharif, a lawmaker in the seven-party Shiite coalition, said, "The alliance is leaning toward changing (the nomination). The majority opinion is in favor of this."

Acting speaker Adnan Pachachi later said the Iraqi parliament session scheduled for Thursday would be delayed for two days to allow time "to intensify our efforts to overcome the obstacles," created after Sunnis and Kurds rejected al-Jaafari's nomination.

"I am confident we will succeed in forming the national unity government that all Iraqis are hoping for," Pachachi said.

The largest bloc in parliament, with 130 lawmakers, the Shiite alliance gets to name the prime minister subject to parliament approval. But the Shiites lack the votes in the 275-member parliament to guarantee their candidate's approval unless they have the backing of the Sunnis and Kurds, whom they need as partners to govern.

With the deadlock dragging on, more Shiite lawmakers have shown a willingness to dump him - though they have been reluctant to do so overtly and break the coalition.

Resolution of the prime minister issue could smooth the way for filling other posts, including the president, two vice presidents, parliament speaker and the two deputy speakers. The Shiites could block Sunni and Kurdish candidates for those positions in retaliation for the standoff over al-Jaafari.

Late Wednesday, the Sunnis decided to support Adnan al-Dulaimi for speaker, a post held by a Sunni Arab in the last parliament.

Thursday's parliament session had been intended to vote on the parliament speaker and his deputies. Lawmakers have met briefly only once since the election four months ago.

Sectarian tensions have been running high since the Feb. 22 bombing of a Shiite shrine in Samarra and the reprisal attacks against Sunni mosques and clerics that followed.

Gunmen attacked a Sunni mosque Thursday in the southern Baghdad district of Saidiya, sparking an hour-long clash before dawn with mosque guards and residents.

No casualties were reported, but the walls of the mosque and nearby houses were damaged, police 1st. Lt. Thair Mahmoud said.

The fighting came days after fierce battles in Baghdad's biggest Sunni neighborhood, Azamiyah, that underlined the deep distrust between the country's communities.

U.S. officials said the violence broke out Monday when attackers fired on Iraqi army patrols and a joint U.S.-Iraqi checkpoints. At least 13 people were killed before calm was restored Tuesday.

But Azamiyah residents said they took up arms when Shiite militias and Interior Ministry commandos moved into the area. Many Sunnis consider those groups little more than death squads.

In a statement late Wednesday, the prime minister's office denied any ministry forces were involved, and said three insurgent groups provoked the clashes by purporting to be from Shiite militias and the ministry.

The statement identified the three insurgent groups as the Islamic Army of Iraq, the 1920 Revolution Brigades and al-Qaida in Iraq.

It said insurgents were making a new effort to infiltrate Baghdad "for armed displays and to destabilize the city."

In other violence reported by police Thursday:

- Gunmen killed two Sadrist militiamen in a drive-by shooting in the southern Baghdad neighborhood of Um al-Maalif. Elsewhere, the bodies of two al-Sadr loyalists were found.

- Armed men broke into a bakery in Baghdad's Dora district and killed two Shiite workers.

- A former officer from Saddam Hussein's security forces was shot to death as he stood near his house in the Shiite city of Karbala.

- A roadside bomb hit a police patrol in the town of Khalis, killing two policemen and a civilian and wounding seven people.

- A roadside bomb killed an Iraqi policeman in Baqouba.

--


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aljaafari; iraq; iraqipm; jaafari
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 04/20/2006 9:24:26 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Allegra; Marine_Uncle; Coop; Calpernia; Gucho; TexKat

Breakthrough???


2 posted on 04/20/2006 9:25:52 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Breakthrough???

I'd say so.

3 posted on 04/20/2006 9:34:38 AM PDT by Allegra (FREERIDERS DO IT ON THE ECONOMY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It only takes one "Manchurian candidate" to screw up the works....


4 posted on 04/20/2006 9:35:46 AM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (Toon Town, Iran...........where reality is the real fantasy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allegra; Cap Huff; Dog; Coop; AdmSmith; jmc1969; Straight Vermonter; Wiz; Marine_Uncle; ...

Great....keep us updated on anything you see.....!!!


5 posted on 04/20/2006 9:57:38 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This has been in the works for a while. The majority of Shiites don't want to go in the al-Sadr/Iran direction at all. Jaafari's ties to that group were seen as a major liability to stabilizing the country.

With Jaafari out of the way, it will be easier to bring the Mahdi Militia and its scumbag leader, al-Sadr under control. Without Jaafari in power, al-Sadr is neutralized.

This is a very good thing! :-)

6 posted on 04/20/2006 10:06:40 AM PDT by Allegra (FREERIDERS DO IT ON THE ECONOMY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Allegra; jmc1969; SandRat; Southack; Grampa Dave; McGavin999; smoothsailing; ..
I am pinging some folks who may be interested in reading this article.
Please do not feel obligated to respond. Obviously Ernest and Allegra where already in conversation.

I know what I want to believe here, but is it to good to be true? The wording is quite specific. If the reporting is an honest representation of the current conditions perhaps things will actually move forward in selecting all the mininitry posts and other required government positions.
For all we know, this UN envoy, Ashraf Qazi, may have simply echoed what Condi, Straw, and US Ambasador Kalmay Khalizad have been saying all along. Being, the only way for a united national government to be formed is to give other party lists a chance in the process.
These people in my opinion, have been so fractioned by so many years of pre-Saddam and Saddam's reign that they just cannot trust one another. Surely it is no different then say in the US, democrates and republicans attempting to work on bi-partisan issues, where one simply does not know who can be trusted to act in good faith, and who will stab someone in the back.
On the real negative side, is that a near majority of Shia, within the context, of the UIA alliances can always come back and say in effect, see we gave in and allowed others we really did not want to participate a chance, and now look what happened, nothing is improving.
Surely a difficult situation. And we all know, regardless of the formation of a new government, the violence may not subside one bit. It most probably will intensify giving the L/MSM more reasons to hammer away. And at the same time prevent a lot of foreign help/commercial/banking/inductry etc., from being willing to come to Iraq to do business.
So many parts of the equation(s) to consider.
I understand the deep divisions between the two major blocks within the UIA, and the one vote difference. So we should not have to take issue with my next to last paragraph. Never the less those mosty but not limited to the Dawa party are almost at half majority within the UIA. Obvously a major alliance within the Shia/some Kurdish communities.
7 posted on 04/20/2006 11:19:38 AM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle

That is excellent news.


8 posted on 04/20/2006 11:24:28 AM PDT by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
And we all know, regardless of the formation of a new government, the violence may not subside one bit.

It has subsided. Significantly.

The place I arrived in for the first time about 29 months ago and this place now are two different animals.

There are still incidents, but it is nothing like the chaos of the earlier days. Things are MUCH better now. And they're improved from one year ago and from six months ago.

There IS progress and it IS moving forward. I wish all of you could see the reality here and see how badly the media distorts things here.

I'll keep saying it as long as people will listen:

This is going to work.

9 posted on 04/20/2006 11:31:58 AM PDT by Allegra (FREERIDERS DO IT ON THE ECONOMY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

"There was a signal from Najaf," Othman said, referring to al-Sistani's office in the Shiite holy city. "Qazi's meetings with (al-Sistani) and al-Sadr were the chief reason that untied the knot."

Wonder what Qazi's meetings with al-Sadr means in this context?


10 posted on 04/20/2006 11:34:33 AM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
" I'll keep saying it as long as people will listen: This is going to work."
I have no reason to doubt you. What some may not recognize is that you may get to talk with people who go to and fro between the green zone and elsewhere in the capital as well as perhaps day trips for instance to provincial capitals for instance.
And though you may not talk directly with them you most probably get good seconday source scuttlebut.
So I have to take your word over some half baked thin white wristed reporter who may have spent their day whoofing down martinis then stand outside in front of a camera.
Stay healthy.
11 posted on 04/20/2006 12:33:06 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
"Wonder what Qazi's meetings with al-Sadr means in this context?"
I also wonder. Could be the UN envoy spoke in same terms as Condi/Straw/Zalmay Khalilzad, indicating Iraq will go down the tubes if a government that will be willing to represent all Iraqi and in addition be willing to do business with westerners is not put in place. Surely, Sistani and his senior clerics can see Sadr must be muzzled once and for all, or at least made impotent for the next four years. Once the government is formed, he and like minded Shia radicals could be forced into a minor role.
And that scenario apparently meets what Sistani has gone for all along. Let the Clergy only be concerned with religious matters and not politics or goverance.
12 posted on 04/20/2006 12:39:47 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
"That is excellent news."
Sure appears on the surface. Now will we see some real results in the next few days. As the article indicates, the UIA asked for a few more days to finalize a new candidate, as well as the parliament holding off what they where supposed to meet on to elect the speaker of parliament that apparently has been approved by all.
If we do not see anything new come out of this say by this following Tuesday, I am suspect, they may still be a long way off. April 28th may go by with nothing resolved.
13 posted on 04/20/2006 1:13:53 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
And though you may not talk directly with them you most probably get good seconday source scuttlebut.

I work with them, talk with them, and even live with some of them. I have many close Iraqi friends now. Two of my employees are local nationals and we have them in spades working for us here. Some live on our compound because it has become known that they work with Americans and it's dangerous for them to go to their homes right now.

So I've been interacting with the Iraqis for a couple of years. They're so much like we are. We drink together, we laugh and cut up together, and one thing I've learned is they want the same thing we do. To live free and without fear. They're not like what the news depicts at all. And believe me, I was as surprised (and delightedly so) to discover this.

14 posted on 04/20/2006 2:25:53 PM PDT by Allegra (FREERIDERS DO IT ON THE ECONOMY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
I suspected that you personally knew at least a few Iraqi, due to your work environment. Appreciate your detailed reply.
Pretty soon you shall be able to count days to your R&R on your toes. Hang in there.
15 posted on 04/20/2006 2:40:00 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
Pretty soon you shall be able to count days to your R&R on your toes.

11.

16 posted on 04/20/2006 2:46:35 PM PDT by Allegra (FREERIDERS DO IT ON THE ECONOMY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

nah your vision is skewed :)


17 posted on 04/20/2006 2:47:21 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Where are you going?


18 posted on 04/20/2006 3:00:20 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
"11"
Hang in there.
19 posted on 04/20/2006 4:05:38 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
Late Wednesday, the Sunnis decided to support Adnan al-Dulaimi for speaker, a post held by a Sunni Arab in the last parliament.

Allegra, do you know who Al Dulaimi is? Is he Shiia? Is he with Dawa or SCIRI? It might give us a clue about what they are planning.

20 posted on 04/20/2006 4:15:56 PM PDT by McGavin999 (The US media is afflicted with Attention Deficit Disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson