1 posted on
04/20/2006 6:13:21 AM PDT by
ckilmer
To: ckilmer
Ever notice, through the years, that whenever these predictions are made the "peak" is always seems to be a few years out.
2 posted on
04/20/2006 6:18:07 AM PDT by
tx_eggman
(Islamofascism ... bringing you the best of the 7th century for the past 1300 years.)
To: ckilmer; Names Ash Housewares
To: ckilmer
But I wonder does the author of the article assume we're not improving oil-extaction technology that much. Thanks to improved offshore production techniques that work even in
very deep water and Royal Dutch Shell's recent announcement that it is possible to extract oil from shale and oil tar sands
in situ without actually mining out the shale/tar sands, we could end up with a far larger oil supply than people think.
If we were to apply the type of steam injection techniques pioneered in California for the type of highly viscous oil found in that state, we could see the proven oil reserves go up by a factor of six or more!
To: ckilmer
There is still a lot of oil in the 'depleted' fields. At current prices, it will be profitable to go get this oil with tertiary recovery methods.
To: ckilmer
We're Doomed.
Interesting, albeit completely inaccurate article that presents opinion as fact, and guesses about future oil production as definites.
Lots of pretty charts, though.
10 posted on
04/20/2006 9:03:18 AM PDT by
wbill
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson