Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul Ross; All
...maybe you could do more to 'reduce the deficit' by putting your money into a U.S. concern...

Somebody please explain to Paul that when everyone (both Americans and the Chinese) puts their money in US concerns, that this is what makes the trade deficit bigger.  It's called the balance of payments.  The Chinese have been buying stocks of US concerns with money that they got by selling stuff like oil below cost.

Maybe I'm not explaining these technical terms clearly enough.   Is there anyone one else here that can tell Paul how the Capital and Current accounts operate?

181 posted on 04/27/2006 2:13:30 PM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]


To: expat_panama
I like your article from Ream Heakal quite a lot. He explains that your position is theoretical. Not real. And look how he concludes his piece:

"Experience has proven, however, that without any controls a sudden reversal of capital flows can not only destroy an economy, but can also result in increased poverty for a nation."


184 posted on 04/27/2006 2:27:55 PM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

To: expat_panama
I've tried...believe me I have tried. But, Paul insists on having things both ways and cannot come to grips that there are no free lunches.
187 posted on 04/27/2006 5:40:08 PM PDT by LowCountryJoe (I'm a Paleo-liberal: I believe in freedom; am socially independent and a borderline fiscal anarchist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

To: expat_panama; Paul Ross; Toddsterpatriot
Check this exchange of views out.

It wasn't until after I reread Paul's reply to me (in his post #531 in the linked to thread) did I realize why he posted it in the first place. I had worded my post kind of awkwardly - certainly to the point that the Rhodes Scholar misunderstood what I was writing and felt that he needed to provide a definition of what the meaning of the word "bond" is. After the he replied I was scratching my head thinking, "Yeah, what's this got to do with the price of tea in China?" But, no matter. It allowed the perfect opportunity for one of us to, once again, take him over the knee and spank his little fanny over his terrible ignorance/stubbornness on economics.

189 posted on 04/27/2006 6:27:39 PM PDT by LowCountryJoe (I'm a Paleo-liberal: I believe in freedom; am socially independent and a borderline fiscal anarchist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson