Posted on 04/19/2006 2:01:59 AM PDT by rhema
Don't let the doorknob hit you on the way out.
I'm entirely satisfied with this result.
Now I eagerly await further resignations at schools in Alabama {science-teacher and anti-President video}, Colorado {geography teacher and anti-President rant}, and South Dakota {"9/11 victims deserved what they got, and were just a buch of little Eichmanns.}
The State cannot dispense God's justice. The Law cannot turn the other cheek. Carried to your extreme it would basically allow anyone to talk their way out of anything.
The good professor seems sorry only because she realizes that she will probably get her students expelled. She underestimated the firestorm she would generate.
She needs to be made an example of. For too long libs have been able to get away with anything by a non-apology apology after the fact.
That is what happens when you have had abortions in the past and have not come terms with what you did.
I was just thinking that putting the crosses back up, handed to her slowly one at at time , with a history might have more of an impact than a fine.
Yup. And thats the difference between Liberals and Conservitives.
I was wondering about that.
ping for the latest
Besides, I haven't heard her ask for anyones forgiveness, have you? I'm not much of a Christian but I'm pretty sure that there are two sides to that forgiveness thing.
One has to truly repent of ones actions before one can be forgiven, right?
And I'm not up early...I'm working very late. I'ts been a busy night down in the EOC. Hopefully I'll be out of here on time this morning and I can get home to get Lurker Jr off to school and then get some sleep.
L
I'll bet the photos were what contributed to her downfall. Without them, the University could hide behind a "so-and-so said it happened, but the professor denies it."
Apparently to her memorializing babies that are killed because of abortions are "silly"?
Just where does one get to that point of reason?
In the Lib crowd, it goes pretty far - even Oprah.
In Conservitive crowd, jail.
IIRC she was due to retire soon anyways. She just moved it up some weeks.
Okay, with that out of the way, Here's how I would do the "accounting" on what she did. There are three sides to her action. She committed a, well, misdeed against "the Peace"; she injured the people who put up the display by destroying their work; she stomped all over the ethos of an educational institution and over the legitimate expectations of a professor.
So she owes "the Peace" something, something like a fine and/or some time in the pokey where she is deprived of the freedom she misused.
She also owes the folks who put up the display recompense for the damage she did to their property and to the product of their labor AND for the violation of their rights. These days, at least here in central VA, property crimes like this are often handled as part of the criminal sentencing procedure. Bad guys, uh, persons, are -- as PART of their punishment -- told to work with "Offender Aid and Restoration (OAR)" to compensate those they have harmed, in addition to a fine and/or other punishment for violating the civil order.
Losing the protection of her tenured status (assuming she had any) and being required to leave the university faculty seems adequate for her putting her "outrage" ahead of the requirements of an academic community.
That's how I see it. And I don't want the state to be very merciful to someone who stomps on the first amendment as she did. A week in the pokey (and she has to serve the entire week and not on weekends) and $1k fine would be adequate, IMHO.
I agree. Photos were important evidence. Every conservative student these days ought to be given video/audio recording equipment to take with them to school every day.
I wonder why she and her students were not charged with criminal mischief? Go figure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.