An interesting point - the animals who tend to mate for life: swans, eagles, wolves, coyotes and beavers(hah), etc. seem to have a higher incidence of homosexuality than those animals who mate with whoever's handy.
No, I'm not.
"Fag-haters" say that homosexuality is "unnatural" - meaning it doesen't happen in Nature. But it does. The reason for such behavior is debatable, but the fact that animals DO exhibit this behavior is factual.
Talk about missing the point... And not everybody who says homosexuality is unnatural is referring to what happens in nature - there's also a biological aspect to which people are referring. Homosexuality in nature is similar to the homosexual behavior in prison.
You are missing several points.
Your point is flawed in premise in that it conflates a subjectively felt and declared orientation with objectively observed animal activity.
Additionally, homosexual activity is always disordered and unnatural REGARDLESS there are some exceptions to the norm that choose to engage in it... Homosexual activity is a procreative dead end...
Finally -take your "Fag-haters" language elsewhere...
The act of a male animal humping another male animal has nothing to do with sex. It has to do with dominance. This is why dominant female dogs will hump male dogs. The act of mounting is a form of securing a position of prominance within the animal's society.
Thus, when a dog humps your leg he is trying to exert dominance over you. Or do you think this means the dog is sexually attracted to your leg?