[Tailgunner Joe]

Yeah, right just like Bush helps bin Laden by invading Iraq. We are only creating more terrorists by trying to fight them. What we should do is give them all our money and property and then they'll be happy and peaceful and renounce terror and we'll all sing Kum-baya.

[Gengis Khan]

Wrong analogy.

Bush "invaded" Iraq to overthrow another brutal dictator (whose brutality exceeds that of Gyanendra by miles) who has ruthlessly strangulated any move towards democracy and has been killing his own people for decades. His entire regime along with the supporters of his ruling establishment (i.e the Bath party) are terrorists. And they are actively supported by a neighboring terrorist state Syria.
Another terrorists state Iran is supporting the Shia's in the South.

In stark contrast to Gyanendra, Bush is actually trying to restore democracy by carrying out elections in that part of the world where democracy was unheard of. Far from conducting elections Gyanendra has dissolved democracy, imprisoned democratically elected members of the Parliament and had clamped down on individual rights. Gyanendra's actions are more in line with Saddam Hussein's (miniature Saddam Hussein).

The terrorists were always there long before Bush came to the scene. The libel that Bush is creating the terrorists is similar to your accusation that India is creating the Maoists in Nepal.