Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ModelBreaker
Sorry for my tardy reply, I was unexpectedly out-of-touch for a few days.

Do you regard the chart in post 15 on this thread as a reasonably accurate representation of temperature and CO2 levels?

Over geological history, yes. But it doesn't resolve the Holocene or the Pleistocene glacial/interglacial period at all.

Where do you see us at this moment on the chart in terms of temperature and CO2?

Beyond the end of it.

How do you know we are in 'a very stable interglacial period?'

Because I do. And the plots below illustrate why. The first plot shows temperatures (blue) and CO2 concentrations (red) from Antarctic ice cores from 420,000 years ago to present. The second plot is a close-up of the last 18,000 years only (same data as the first plot). You can see in the first plot how "jumpy" temperatures were in previous interglacials (the warm periods) -- and the glacial periods weren't much more stable. The second plot shows clearly how stable the past 11,000 years have been, and this is the period since the most recent retreat of the continental glaciers. In truth, this is an abnormally stable interglacial period.


64 posted on 04/24/2006 1:33:10 PM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: cogitator

Another question, as you seem to have some knowledge on the subject. Are the degrees and ppm on your two charts equivalent to the same figures on the chart in the thread? Or are they measuring different things--eg one is measuring average temperature in antarctica and another on the equator or some such difference?


65 posted on 04/24/2006 7:07:22 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson