Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mh8782
"Not if global warming theory is correct. Studying paleoclimate can give us clues into how things may change, but it's not especially relevant to predicting would happen if CO2 levels were to double in such a short space of time (100-200 years)"

The point you're missing is that in the past, the CO2 level has ALSO been higher (in some cases MUCH higher) than it is today. The rate of change means zip. What matters is the concentration in the atmosphere.

13 posted on 04/18/2006 9:29:48 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog
The rate of change means zip. What matters is the concentration in the atmosphere.

Not quite accurate, WW. The climate system has a lag time of response, mainly due to the heat content of ocean water. Over millions of years in paleoclimate history, the rate of change doesn't mean much. But over centuries, it is an important variable.

52 posted on 04/19/2006 11:27:35 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson