[AntiGuv]

To be fair, if a hypothetical trio of would-be rapists were to introduce themselves to their victim, they would be unlikely to use their real names.

According to reports of the original complaint, the stripper remembered the names because that's what she heard them calling one another, not because they told her their names.

But without DNA evidence the esteemed DA will have a hard time proving a case.

Especially when the stripper claims to have gouged one of them so deep that she lost her fake nails, yet had none of their DNA between her nails, even though all she did afterward, according to reports, is pass out in a car.

One of the little bits of dissembling on the part of the DA is that the main reason such a low percentage of rape cases have DNA evidence is because the victim showers and/or waits days before reporting the crime.

[Cheburashka]

According to reports of the original complaint, the stripper remembered the names because that's what she heard them calling one another, not because they told her their names.
---
Well, then her story could still be true if they were using fake names, couldn't it?
For the record, based on what I have read, I still have a lot of skepticism that a crime happened. But if it did I want it punished.