Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2
Why does Holbrooke seem so positive that such resignations will occur?

Here are things that I have noticed over the last 6 years:

1. Bill Clinton, before leaving office, moved many lower level political appointees into civil service positions within the government. These people are in the Pentagon, State, Justice, and the CIA. They cannot be fired unless they are caught doing something really wrong, like stealing or embezzlement. These are the sources of the unending leaks.

2. There definitely is a faction in the CIA which is pro-democrat, anti-Bush, and has been screwing up intelligence and leaking information since shortly after September 11, 2001.

3. General McInnerny said yesterday that associates of John Kerry were facilitating the meetings of the dissident generals with the press.

4. Interesting that these generals choose to speak out NOW, and not 6 months ago. Why would that be>

I am not one for black helicopters and tin foil theories, but I am beginning to fear that there is a real conspiracy by liberals within the government, aided and abbetted by the press in real and not imagined collusion.

Holbrooke may be having delusions of grandeur over his influence and how many generals would actually jump ship, but Tony Blankley is taking this seriously, and I have never known him to be an alarmist.

105 posted on 04/18/2006 7:55:24 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Marple
4. Interesting that these generals choose to speak out NOW, and not 6 months ago. Why would that be?

The critics (Kerry, Biden, Pelosi, Harkins, etc) were calling for Rumsfeld's head around the same time in 2004. These same shrill tones are now coming from the generals, some of whom are still using the arguments about the invasion plan. Why then and now? In 2004 it was the Presidential election and now it is the mid-terms

The attacks on Rumsfeld are really attacks on Bush and the war. A Rumsfeld resignation is an admission that the war is not going well and that the war was a mistake. Some are comparing Rumsfeld to McNamara so that the Iraq war can be linked to Vietnam. In sum, it is all about politics and nothing else.

119 posted on 04/18/2006 8:19:42 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple
"3. General McInnerny said yesterday that associates of John Kerry were facilitating the meetings of the dissident generals with the press."

That is practically treasonous to me. I got out in 1973, made to feel ashamed of my service because of Kerry's concurrent boostering the chopping off of fingers and heads crap so he could launch his political career in Leftachussetts.

But I did get a job in Leftachusetts! (though the state later became Left-it-chussetts to me).

121 posted on 04/18/2006 8:20:27 AM PDT by cookcounty (Army Vet, Army Dad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson