Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paleo Conservative; MeanWestTexan; Paddlefish; Eaker; archy; Chode; Shooter 2.5
at least some soldiers are getting their expressed wish for a bigger round fulfilled: 6.8mm SPC review and "6.8x43mm SPC Cartridge for Urban Warfare CQB and Short-to-Medium-Range Sniping" and, from our good buddies at Barrett Arms, 6.8mm SPC Upper Receiver retrofit kits and rifles
35 posted on 04/17/2006 4:41:59 PM PDT by King Prout (The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: King Prout
I have never served in the military but own a few sporting firearms and go shooting quite a bit. I always thought that the 22-250 Rem would be a great all purpose round for rifles or machine guns. I have read up on the 6.8, it seems like a winner. The old 30 Rem necked down to .27 and small enough to chamber in the M-16. I would not want to be shot with one. I find it hard to believe that anyone could take even a single .223 in a vital area and walk away unless they were 400 plus yards away from the shooter when hit. I would like to see anyone that thinks the .223 is inadequate stand and take one in the chest then talk about how wimpy the round is. (just kidding, if you are an American or one of our allies)I went shooting with a .22 hornet this weekend and you should have seen the varmints explode! Nothing like celebrating the resurrection of the lord then a prairie dog shoot! The old hornet is not on par with the .223.
56 posted on 04/17/2006 5:23:57 PM PDT by 30 Govt.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson