To: LS
John Deere.
(cotton harvester)
29 posted on
04/17/2006 10:19:25 AM PDT by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: Old Professer
Funny, but it's also pretty much a given among economic historians that slavery had already started to gravitate into industry and urban settings and that had there been NO cotton, slavery would have thrived. See Huston, Calculating the Value of the Union or Roger Ransom's "counter-factual," Confederate States of America.
36 posted on
04/17/2006 10:42:17 AM PDT by
LS
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson