Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Not another war
Toledo Blade ^ | April 17, 2006 | Editorial

Posted on 04/17/2006 6:32:33 AM PDT by johnny7

The latest developments in U.S. relations with Iran raise an appalling question: Could the Bush Administration be steering the country into another major, unnecessary war in the Middle East?

There are alarming reports from Washington that the White House and the Department of Defense are considering air strikes - perhaps even nuclear strikes - against Iran. These presumably would be targeted against Iran's alleged developing nuclear weapons capacity. One way to fulfill such U.S. intentions would not require the United States to carry out the strikes; it would be Israel, acting with U.S. sanction, performing the military attack. Such an action would have the same result, however - another major Middle East war involving America.

(Excerpt) Read more at toledoblade.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 04/17/2006 6:32:35 AM PDT by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Could the Bush Administration be steering the country into another major, unnecessary war in the Middle East?

Unnecessary??? A nuclear armed Iran is a disaster for world stability and the author thinks preventing that is unnecessary? The Iranian President has stated his desire to obliterate Israel and to defeat the US and the author thinks a military action to prevent this is unnecessary? Just what would this clown concede is a necessary and jusitified military action?

2 posted on 04/17/2006 6:38:40 AM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
I would be "alarmed" if the Defense Dept. did not have plans on how to strike at Iran. The Pentagon has contingency plans for wars with many nations. Friend and foe alike.
3 posted on 04/17/2006 6:40:04 AM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
Looks like the Iranian government has been passing around all the cash it can to buy compliance from American "newsies".

I don't see any other possible conclusion after reading this story.

4 posted on 04/17/2006 6:41:38 AM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Could the Bush Administration be steering the country into another major, unnecessary war in the Middle East?

Let's see, Iran is being led by a complete nutcase who is trying his best to build nukes, and it is Bush who gets the blame here for "steering" us towards a war?

5 posted on 04/17/2006 6:41:42 AM PDT by SIDENET (Gonna shake it, gonna break it, let's forget it better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Sorry Toledo Blade! Yeah, it sucks being the big boy on the block but it comes with responsibilities.

This same paper would tear Israel another asshole if they attack Iran.

6 posted on 04/17/2006 6:41:55 AM PDT by zarf (It's time for a college football playoff system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

If God forbid Iran were to strike first and carry out a terror attack in the US I suppose this paper would be the first to scream "Bush did not act!"


7 posted on 04/17/2006 6:42:14 AM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

This idiot/editor is in his own screwed up world. They can't see past their politics. I guess he thinks we should just sit around and do some more negotiating. I HATE cowards!

These people will be the same people bitching as we cordone off a major US city just incenerated by a terrorist nuclear device. They will be calling for investigations on how we could have let this happen.


8 posted on 04/17/2006 6:43:49 AM PDT by ChinaThreat (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

Amen Brother.............


9 posted on 04/17/2006 6:43:51 AM PDT by Osage Orange (The old/liberal/socialist media is the most ruthless and destructive enemy of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
Could the Bush Administration be steering the country into another major, unnecessary war in the Middle East?

There are alarming reports from Washington that the White House and the Department of Defense are considering air strikes - perhaps even nuclear strikes - against Iran. These presumably would be targeted against Iran's alleged developing nuclear weapons capacity.

It's amazing how many psychotics are employed on newspaper editorial staffs.

10 posted on 04/17/2006 6:44:41 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChinaThreat

You can bet if there was a "D" in the White House, they would be banging the drums even louder for war. The NOW Gang would go on non-stop about how abusive Iranians are to women.


11 posted on 04/17/2006 6:45:38 AM PDT by dfwgator (Florida Gators - 2006 NCAA Men's Basketball Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Nobody wants another war but it's treasonous how uninformed newspapers are.
12 posted on 04/17/2006 6:46:04 AM PDT by Vision ("There are no limits to growth because there are no limits of human intelligence" Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

A lot of people at FR scoffed when I posted the opening of the No War in Iran coalition. Everyone thought that the whole thing would be ignored due to poll numbers at the time. When Chomsky speaks the main stream media takes marching order. These idiots are likely to cause a war by making us look weak for negotiations.


13 posted on 04/17/2006 6:47:00 AM PDT by armymarinemom (My sons freed Iraqi and Afghan Honor Roll students.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

The first wave of strikes should be at MSM offices worldwide.


14 posted on 04/17/2006 6:47:09 AM PDT by RouxStir (No islam, know peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
Oh, no, no, no Iran is only allegedly pursuing nuclear weapons. I believe the author thinks the proper thing to due is to have international and UN participation in a dialog with Iran and perhaps make sure we don't upset the stability of the region with our continued saber rattling by these out-of-control cowboys in the Bush administration.

If he is wrong and Iran obtains nuclear weapons well then so what, don't we have them? So who are we to tell Iran, an independent nation that they can't have them? They're just trying to protect their interests as we are, no more, no less. We have to stop this bullying we are not making friends this way.

Don't you agree with this enlightened approach? (sarcasm off)

15 posted on 04/17/2006 6:49:31 AM PDT by marlon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Of course, if we do as the Liberals want and don't prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons and they do manage to sneak one into the US, their most likely target (or targets) will be a major city. And major cities, here in the US, are predominantly Liberal. So, Liberals are willing to risk the nuclear annihilation of one or more of their political strongholds just to poke a finger in the eye of George W. Bush. Oh yes, please remember people, they are the smart ones and we're stupid.
16 posted on 04/17/2006 6:50:20 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Don't let the facts alter you opinion...screed alert


17 posted on 04/17/2006 6:51:07 AM PDT by Edgerunner (Proud to be an infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
There's a lot of loose pudding forming in the spines of Democrats... and some Republicans too on military action in Iran. The longer we sit and debate, the more confident Iran becomes in believing we'll do nothing... and the closer they get to a bomb.
18 posted on 04/17/2006 6:51:29 AM PDT by johnny7 (“Nah, I ain’t Jewish, I just don’t dig on swine, that’s all.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

The Iranians might indeed understand Mutually Assured Distruction (MAD) and that might bring comfort to some people. However, the Iranians a long time ago have learned how to utilize those who have "nothing left to lose" to do their dirty work. Imagine trying to prove to the world that a nuke exploded in Israel was traceable to Iran. If they choose to use a delivery system other than a missile or a bomber who could say for sure where the nuke came from? And even if it could be proven, would the world media choose to report it?


19 posted on 04/17/2006 6:51:53 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
I have always wondered what would happen to a person who had an operation to hook up their optic nerves to their anal nerves. Now I know what happens....they become editorial writers for the Toledo Blade as they definitely have a crappy vision of the real world. I have often thought that if God were to give the world an enema, he would insert it in Toledo, appropriately so it seems!
20 posted on 04/17/2006 6:53:01 AM PDT by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson