To: ishabibble
Oh please. A women being free to be themselves is being a housewife? To instill in a young girl that the only thing that makes her "ladylike" is to aspire to do housework is as stupid as what the feminazis have been doing the past 40 years.
8 posted on
04/17/2006 5:27:02 AM PDT by
VanDeKoik
(Quick! Press the Sarcasm button!)
To: VanDeKoik
I agree. Just as stupid is the headline, "educated women (plural) has (singular)". Why is it still the feeling that women should be pushed all in one direction or the other?
To: VanDeKoik
Agreed. Being free to be themselves (IMO) means doing whichever is best for their children, their marriage, and their aspirations.. probably in that order. There is certainly no one correct answer.
To: VanDeKoik
Oh please yourself. I could just cry when I see what is happening to young girls today, and where on earth did you get the idea that ladylike behaviour equals housework.
Know any 16-19 yr. old girls? I do. All sorts of achievements
and more miles on them than Rte. 95. Only American feminism could have ever put prostitution out of business, but that is what is happening.
Wild On, Mardi Gras, 6th grader performing oral sex on the morning school bus.
So yes, definitely. Women should be protecting the children that they brought into this world, now more than ever. There are a world of options out there, but women need to break out of all the "liberated" crap, and it's not going to be easy. Just look at how easily you bristled!!!
15 posted on
04/17/2006 5:36:51 AM PDT by
ishabibble
(UNITED WE STAND DIVIDED WE FALL)
To: VanDeKoik
To instill in a young girl that the only thing that makes her "ladylike" is to aspire to do housework is as stupid as what the feminazis have been doing the past 40 years. I think it's a larger idea than that. It's to instill in a young girl the truth that if she doesn't make home "home," nobody will. Further, it's that building your own civilization is a higher calling than wearing a floppy bow-tie to work for someone else at a bank or a law firm.
It's not that there's something wrong with the bank or law firm thing. It's that making a home is a higher calling.
To: VanDeKoik
Raising a happy, healthy family and running a household is a full-time job. Unfortunately feminists have told women it isn't enough. But her family knows it is.
18 posted on
04/17/2006 5:43:21 AM PDT by
mlc9852
To: VanDeKoik
Our Girls are educated women who raise their own children, who are now becoming educated women that will raise their own children.
20 posted on
04/17/2006 5:48:36 AM PDT by
Coldwater Creek
("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
To: VanDeKoik
Our Girls are educated women who raise their own children, who are now becoming educated women that will raise their own children.
21 posted on
04/17/2006 5:49:03 AM PDT by
Coldwater Creek
("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
To: VanDeKoik
"Oh please. A women being free to be themselves is being a housewife? To instill in a young girl that the only thing that makes her "ladylike" is to aspire to do housework is as stupid as what the feminazis have been doing the past 40 years"
That's not what the article or post 6 said. What they said was that these wives were devoting their energy to raising children as *opposed* to the 50s stereotype of wife=dishwasher.
Your statement as it stands isn't false, but you're attacking a statement that the person you answered didn't make.
Anyway this is good news; if wives want to raise kids that means they're having kids, which means Eurabia may not be Europe's future after all.
31 posted on
04/17/2006 6:39:38 AM PDT by
No.6
(www.fourthfightergroup.com)
To: VanDeKoik
To instill in a young girl that the only thing that makes her "ladylike" is to aspire to do housework . Damn, did you even read the article? It doesn't say that anywhere.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson