Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheBattman

There's also something that bothers me about the comments that she can do anything naked she wants in front of these guys, but if she doesn't want to be touched, then she shouldn't have one little fingerprint on her....that it would be assault or rape.

Sorry, but there's a huge difference between the "I was dancing naked in front of a stag party" rape and the type where someone is overpowered by in a brutal assault.

It's like selling "I hate Mohammed" lapel pins in downtown Baghdad and complaining that someone tried to kill you. Sure they did, but you weren't being the brightest crayon in the box, either.


86 posted on 04/17/2006 2:53:15 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

You're usually a reasonable person. I never expected to see the "she deserved it because she was wearing provocative clothing" argument from you.

Shame on you.

What a woman wears or doesn't wear does not entitle men to rape her. No means no. Naked or provocative doesn't mean yes. Teasing has been around forever, and men promote it. Teasing is one thing, rape is entirely different.

If someone wants sex, they should hire hookers, not strippers. And if a man can't control his penis in front of a naked woman, he's not much of a man.


123 posted on 04/17/2006 10:27:36 AM PDT by BagCamAddict (Prayers for the victims - human and animal - of Katrina and Rita)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson