I don't want to get into a long debate about this (don't have the time) but I think what you are saying is you don't have a right to be forced to take a DNA test without a court order. If so, of course I agree. My point, my opinion, which is probably obvious to you, is that is that it not good investigative procedure to require it from everyone except the black guy just because the stripper said the guy(s) were white. It would make more sense to simply eliminate everyone.
I agree - I would have tested the black guy for his own good - to include him on the team. Good practice or not.
I agree. The cops should have swabbed everyone who was there.
Morning Nothern Alliance,
Your point is a good one. A complete and thorough investigative process would have resulted in the DA asking or obtaining a court order that all the players on the team,regardless of race to give a DNA sample.
If the alleged (vic) were so intoxicated, she may not have known who were her alleged rapist(s)
It is called eliminating suspects and substantiating if this case is founded or unfounded.
The truth will either be for or against the alleged (vic) or (perps).
In my opinion, the DA is a complete fool for not asking or obtaining a court to have (all)players tested.
My theory is this whole facade of a case was planned by the alleged vic and some "HASOPA" to generate some "long green" in their unviable fanny-pack coffers.
Even if these young men are found to be completely innocent, the race baiters will cry foul as usual.
The truth is the ultimate quest here and I hope that justice will prevail either for or against all involved.
As I See It,
NSNR