One of the things I don't see reported is how many men's semen did the "dancer" have on, in, around her? What other DNA evidence is there?
This is critical evidence and it does not seem to be coming out.
If there is any semen at all, the prosecution is going to have a very hard time.
Follow the logic -
The DA wanted to run DNA evidence. He stated - in legal docs (in order to get order to take DNA samples) that it would prove who was there.
The defense said "You will find nothing linking our boys to the scene with DNA" - prior to test results. They also said "We will go public with test results as soon as they are available" -
Now ask - why would they do that? The only reason is if they knew the results would come back negative. And how would they know that? Because they knew they didn't do it!
If there was any chance of positive DNA, they would have started spinning about "It was consentual, now she is claiming rape, etc." make it a he said she said.
They didn't do that. Logically the only reason is they knew they would pass the test.
This is the state of racism/sexism in america.