To: freedom44
Since 2003??? You mean that then president Carter didn't have a plan to invade and free the hostages? For all the money we give to them, the Pentagon BETTER have plans to invade just about anywhere for a whole host of scenarios. Therefore, it is a pretty lame headline when you think about it. Which means either there is an agenda behind sensationalizing a routine military function ... or the reporter is just clueless.
4 posted on
04/16/2006 5:20:31 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
("Too soon to remember??? How about TOO SOON TO FORGET!" from Mr. Silverback)
To: NonValueAdded
I believe Carter rejected the plans. Thought he could conquer a whole country with a couple of helicopters.
Hope he wasn't typical of submariners.
5 posted on
04/16/2006 5:24:23 PM PDT by
muawiyah
(-)
To: NonValueAdded
Which means either there is an agenda behind sensationalizing a routine military function ...or the reporter is just clueless.
Um...I would say...both.
27 posted on
04/17/2006 6:21:06 AM PDT by
Eagle of Liberty
(The Democrat Party is engulfed in a Culture of Hypocrisy)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson