1 posted on
04/16/2006 2:23:48 PM PDT by
SK85
To: SK85
If France can do it, why can't we?
They've been way, way, way ahead of the game in that department.
To: SK85
No Scrappleface? No Onion? This is a joke, right? Talk about strange bedfellows! This is tantamount to Satan walking down the aisle and getting saved.
3 posted on
04/16/2006 2:32:05 PM PDT by
Migraine
(...diversity is great (until it happens to you)...)
To: SK85
To: SK85
Well, now that Greenpeace approves, I guess we can move ahead. Just a little 30-year delay. Does this mean that press coverage starts to become favorable now?
6 posted on
04/16/2006 2:45:36 PM PDT by
speedy
To: SK85
Although I agree with the author about nuke energy....this turnaround is all about the global warming agenda.
7 posted on
04/16/2006 2:50:01 PM PDT by
fizziwig
(Democrats: so far off the path, so incredibly vicious, so sadly pathetic.)
To: SK85
Not bad. Better thirty years ago, though....
8 posted on
04/16/2006 2:51:03 PM PDT by
Grut
To: SK85
To: SK85
Duh. Nevertheless, it's good to see this article by a certified environmentalist in one of the major opinion-forming newspapers.
We need nuclear power, but nothing will be licensed or built until the trend-following sheep are persuaded that nuclear power has been approved by the opinion leaders they blindly follow. No liberal politician will climb on board until the environmental movement gives him permission.
It's only about 20 years too late. Dear Jane Fonda, who lent her image to the North Vietnamese at a key point in time, lent her image to the movement to end nuclear power plant construction. Three-Mile Island, followed up by this movie might be said to mark a decisive moment in leftist opinion manipulation:
15 posted on
04/16/2006 4:08:01 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: SK85
So, Greenpeace now admits that their arguments against nuclear energy were specious at best or out right lies at worst.
We would not be in the position we are in now if national policy had not been set by CRACKPOTS! And now, when the country is in crisis in regard to oil prices, we are told, well folks after reviewing the evidence that has always been available, nuclear power is the way to go. Sorry. Further they show their purity of purpose and great knowledge by identifying themselves as environmental activists. Idiots. Our country could be brought down by oil exporters and a very active deadly war will result. With sufficient nuclear energy we could convert coal, oil shale, and tar sands into petroleum. This would enable us to support our allies and tell the oil dictators to eat sand. After reading the article I am convinced these self righteous people have no idea what they have done to our nation, indeed the world. GERRRRRRRRR!!!!!
21 posted on
04/16/2006 5:30:06 PM PDT by
Nuc1
(NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
To: SK85
YOu sure this isn't John F'n Kerry?
He was against it before he was for it???
22 posted on
04/16/2006 5:32:16 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: SK85
23 posted on
04/16/2006 6:02:07 PM PDT by
chaosagent
(Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson