So you admit you're posting material you don't understand, in the hope that the site you're quoting know more about it than you do.
Let me assure you they don't. They don't address the issue of the fact that radiogenic (U,Th)/Pb ages use two and sometimes three independent pairs of nuclides, which give mutually consistent ages; and they state falsely that the data could be compromised by non-radiogenic lead, which in fact is corrected for.
Good try but you are wrong. The title only impresses girls