To: Creationist
Your picture is pretty yet it is way out of proportion, that angle is way to big. Makes it look close. The lines if drawn in perspective would be almost indistinguishable. The circle could not be measured in one night. The numbers all work I do know trig. I was top in my class. The circle could be measured in one night. The key piece of information is knowing the time between the initial explosion of the star and the illumination of the rings around it. Supernova 1987A was studied for years after the event. About eight months after we detected the nova, the rings became visible. We know the speed of light by independent analysis. Knowing how far the rings are from the star gives us the radius of the circle. The rest is trigonometry.
You precieve a old universe because the visible phenoma appear to have happened billions or millions of years ago.
Every science man has devised supports the notion of an old earth. If you reject the age of the earth, you're not just rejecting evolution -- you are utterly rejecting all of modern science.
160 posted on
04/18/2006 7:26:50 PM PDT by
Liberal Classic
(No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
To: Liberal Classic
Every science man has devised supports the notion of an old earth. If you reject the age of the earth, you're not just rejecting evolution -- you are utterly rejecting all of modern science.
So those who believe in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior and are men of the physical sciences are not valid because their beliefs are contrary to those who wish the universe to be old. You speak for them to ?
162 posted on
04/18/2006 7:31:58 PM PDT by
Creationist
(If the earth is old show me your proof. Salvation from the judgment of your sins is free.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson