To: mountainlyons
I would be interested to know whether the Nebraska man was exposed by a creationist, and if so, on what basis.
I find it interesting that creationists blindly accept the determination by mainstream science that Piltdown Man was a hoax. How does one know it wasn't a coverup to hide a fossil that would destroy the theory of evolution?
11 posted on
04/16/2006 11:48:27 AM PDT by
js1138
(~()):~)>)
To: js1138
Bones of Contention: A Creationist Assessment of the Human Fossils: Books: Marvin L. Lubenow by Marvin L. Lubenow.
14 posted on
04/16/2006 12:04:48 PM PDT by
Creationist
(If the earth is old show me your proof. Salvation from the judgment of your sins is free.)
To: js1138
How does one know it wasn't a cover up to hide a fossil that would destroy the theory of evolution?
You hold to the ""Theory of Evolution"" as if it were fact, maybe the ToE is "Satan's" cover up to destroy your soul and get you to believe that there is not a God who created the universe and everything in it it 144 hours 6000 years ago and lose your chance to make it to heaven.
16 posted on
04/16/2006 12:08:33 PM PDT by
Creationist
(If the earth is old show me your proof. Salvation from the judgment of your sins is free.)
To: js1138
Is ignorance contagious? Or is our educational system turning out ever more scientific illiterates?
20 posted on
04/16/2006 12:18:45 PM PDT by
balrog666
(There is no freedom like knowledge, no slavery like ignorance. - Ali ibn Ali-Talib)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson